183
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Comparison of MARC Content Designation Utilization in OCLC WorldCat Records with National, Core, and Minimal Level Record Standards

, , , &
Pages 36-64 | Published online: 18 Aug 2009
 

Abstract

Commonly used fields and subfields in 56 million Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) WorldCat bibliographic records are identified based on the analysis of format-specific record sets and the calculation of utilization thresholds, with the purpose of comparing these elements with existing recommendations by Library of Congress (LC) agencies for national, core, and minimal level records. The background and purposes of the Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) BIBCO, CONSER, and National and Minimal Level Record Requirements are reviewed. Methodology for conducting the analyses, as well as factors affecting and influencing the analysis methodology, is explained. Results of the comparison of commonly used fields and subfields with the elements prescribed in PCC BIBCO, CONSER, and National and Minimal Level Record Requirements are presented. Results provide standards designers and the cataloging community at large with information to facilitate development of cataloging recommendations and guidelines and inform practice.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Research funding is provided by a National Leadership Grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services, with additional funding provided by the University of North Texas, School of Library and Information Sciences.

Notes

[a]Footnotes that appear in the standards to qualify the requirements have been removed.

[a]Items marked with an asterisk are based on subfield level requirement, field block requirement, or character position requirements.

[a]Items marked with an asterisk are based on subfield level requirement, field block requirement, or character position requirements.

[a]Items marked with single asterisk are based on field level requirement. Items marked with double asterisk are based on field block requirement.

[a]Items marked with single asterisk are based on field level requirement. Items marked with double asterisk are based on field block requirement.

[a]Items marked with single asterisk are based on field level requirement. Items marked with double asterisk are based on field block requirement.

[a]Items marked with single asterisk are based on field level requirement. Items marked with double asterisk are based on field block requirement.

[a]Items marked with single asterisk are based on field level requirement. Items marked with double asterisk are based on field block requirement.

[a]Items marked with single asterisk are based on field level requirement. Items marked with double asterisk are based on field block requirement.

[a] Legend:

[a] Legend:

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 158.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.