147
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Revisiting the Contextual Information Available to Readers Reading

Pages 216-228 | Published online: 09 Jun 2011
 

Abstract

This research investigates the ability of adult proficient readers to predict words that have been fully or partially deleted, without being able to read what came after the blank. Predictions were analyzed for accuracy and if inaccurate for their grammatical nature, syntactic and semantic acceptability, and retention of the author's meaning. Finally, the sentence and text location of the deletion were determined. Findings indicate that readers were more accurate in their predictions than commonly reported in the research and the significant saliency of beginning letter as advocated by some reading theorists. It also was discovered that various factors impacted the accuracy of readers' predictions such as the grammatical nature of the word (beyond the typical content vs. function word distinction), and its location in the sentence and the text. Given these findings, it may be the case that readers utilize whatever necessary information a text makes available and that the density or selectivity of the processing is very much text dependent.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 93.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.