402
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Editorial

Occupational therapy practitioners have been working in the schools for more than 40years. With the passage of PL94-142, occupational therapy practitioners were identified as related service providers and worked to identify how to best apply their skills and expertise in the schools. With the goal to ensure that occupational therapy services were educationally relevant, many practitioners partnered with teachers to address written communication/handwriting since this skill is critical to successful occupational engagement in the schools. However, in some school systems, handwriting is no longer systematically taught. This can be due to challenges such as the lack of a curriculum in a district; the lack of time teachers have to teach handwriting; and poor client factors such as poor shoulder girdle strength, poor trunk stability, and fine motor challenges. Additionally, children are being asked to write at younger and younger ages and the question emerges; are they developmentally ready to meet the handwriting demands they are facing in their school settings?

The Occupational Therapy Practice Framework (AOTA, Citation2014) helps define areas to address when promoting good handwriting skills, preventing challenges with handwriting and assess/address as part of intervention when supporting handwriting performance (see ). Additionally, the occupational therapy practitioners’ skills in activity analysis can help inform educational teams regarding contextual and environmental factors that may impact handwriting performance in the educational setting. It is clear that the skills and expertise of an occupational therapy practitioner can support not only handwriting remediation/intervention, but the development of appropriate practices (district wide and in the classroom) that support promotion of handwriting skills and the prevention of poor handwriting skills.

Table 1. The occupational therapy practice framework and handwriting.

Vander Hart, Fitzpatrick, and Cortesa (Citation2010) reviewed the current literature and identified eight of the most effective, research-based instructional handwriting practices. These included:

  1. Frequent/daily lessons: 50 to 100 minutes of handwriting instruction per week with daily practice is optimal.

  2. Direct and Explicit Instruction: Specifically teach how to form upper and lowercase letters in a specific order. This includes emphasizing similarities or differences between letters.

  3. Modeling: Components of handwriting such as proper pencil grip, paper position and letter formation need to be modeled consistently by all educators.

  4. Guided Practice: Students trace, copy and use visual cues to learn how to form letters. Then they produce the letters from memory.

  5. Use of Feedback: Feedback (re: letter formation, legibility, etc….) needs to be provided, not only after the student has finished a paper but also during the process of writing.

  6. Independent Practice: Students should be given opportunities to self-evaluate their writing and to practice and review handwriting.

  7. Integrated Lessons: Handwriting should be taught within the context of a writing assignment.

  8. Writing Materials: Have several types of paper and writing utensils available as the student is learning to write.

When reviewing these data, it is clear that a school-based occupational therapy practitioner cannot be the sole teacher of handwriting. Systems need to be developed where the expertise of the occupational therapist can provide promotion and prevention strategies in addition to direct intervention to support the day-to-day handwriting practices within the classroom. Moving from the role of soley providing one-on-one and/or small group handwriting interventions to district wide, systems-based interventions may result in better outcomes for a larger number of students.

It is my hope that as you read the articles in this special issue that you will think carefully about how these data can be applied within the educational setting. How can the skills and expertise of an occupational therapy practitioner best be used to address promotion and prevention strategies? While it is clear that occupational therapy practitioners have skills and the expertise to address occupational performance, in the schools, by supporting a student’s handwriting performance, based on the research on effective handwriting practices, practitioners must work as part of a team in order to implement the best strategies.

References

  • American Occupational Therapy Association. (2014). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (3rd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(Suppl. 1), S1–S48. doi:10.5014/ajot.2014.682006
  • Vander Hart, N., Fitzpatrick, P., & Cortesa, C. (2010). In-depth analysis of handwriting curriculum and instruction in four kindergarten classrooms. Reading and Writing, 23, 673–699. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9178-6

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.