480
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Functional, communicative, and hybrid barriers to accessing mental health care in LGBTQ+ communities

&
Pages 513-527 | Received 09 Dec 2021, Accepted 15 Nov 2022, Published online: 28 Feb 2023
 

ABSTRACT

Understanding how LGBTQ+ populations experience common mental health care barriers reveals uncommon ways these barriers interact, layer, and compound to increase health disparities. This mixed methods study organised 250 open ended responses into 30 codes situated along a functional to communicative spectrum. The codes revealed sub-categories and relationships between barrier groupings which highlight ways mental health care obstacles for sexual and gender minorities span categories and are operationalised in unique ways that compound constraints. Organizing LGBTQ+ mental health care access obstacles along a continuum that spans functional barriers (i.e. time, money, transportation) to communicative ones (i.e. stigma, trust) revealed a hybrid category (i.e. providers, bureaucracy) where functional and communicative barriers overlap, mesh and operate simultaneously. Lack of access to trained mental health care providers who offer affirming, appropriate care sits at the centre of this web of constraints and as such is influential in a wide array of mental health care issues. Prioritising mental health care workforce training in LGBTQ+ specific competencies has the potential to create a ‘ripple effect’ that mitigates interconnected mental health care barriers throughout this spectrum.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge Equitas Health for their feedback on the survey measure.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Data availability statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article [and/or] its supplementary materials.

Notes

1. Because the health needs of sexual versus gender minorities are different, some researchers (see Spencer & Patterson, Citation2017) recommend referring to the various groups as LGB (lesbian, gay, bisexual) or Trans/GNC (Transgender or gender non-conforming). We initially adopted this separation in our study, but multiple participants expressed a desire to be referred to as a unified group. We use the LGBTQ+ term to represent all sexual and/or gender minority communities who participated in this study at their request.

Additional information

Funding

There are no funders to declare.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 253.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.