1,086
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular Articles

Reliability of a basketball specific testing protocol for footwear fit and comfort perception

, &
Pages 151-158 | Received 02 Jun 2011, Accepted 06 Oct 2011, Published online: 08 Dec 2011
 

Abstract

This study introduces a method for evaluating fit and comfort perception of basketball footwear by using a basketball specific course (BSC) and to examine respective inter-day reliability.

Methods: The BSC incorporated a sequence of acceleration, deceleration, lateral shuffling, lay-up, backward running, jumping, and landing movements. Nineteen university basketball players provided their perception scores of four fit and seven comfort items after going through the BSC. Six footwear conditions were counterbalanced. Perception scores were analysed by repeated measures ANOVAs (comfort) or Friedman tests (fit) as VAS and Likert scales were applied. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. For reliability analysis, a retest (day 2) was performed 2 weeks after using the identical protocol of the first test day (day 1). Two-way repeated measures ANOVAs and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of shoe ratings were used to determine inter-day effect and inter-day reliability.

Results: Shoe effects on comfort were found for heel cushioning, forefoot cushioning, collar, medial–lateral control, and overall comfort in either one or both test days. Shoe effects on fit (heel region) were only identified on day 2. No inter-day effect was found for all fit and comfort perception measurements. All comfort items showed substantial inter-day reliability (ICC, 0.61 to 0.8). Only one fit item (shoe length) showed almost perfect reliability (ICC > 0.80) while the others showed moderate reliability (ICC, 0.41 to 0.6).

Conclusion: Differences in basketball footwear fit and comfort perception were identified when performing the BSC testing protocol. The current protocol demonstrated substantial reliability for evaluating comfort perception but only moderate reliability for evaluating fit perception in most cases, indicating that distinct testing protocols for comfort and fit perception need to be considered for respective testing.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Beijing Municipal Commission of Science and Technology.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 340.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.