![Sample our Sports and Leisure journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5949/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Sports-Leisure.jpg"})
Abstract
Objective: The effect of footwear torsional stiffness on lower extremity biomechanics is not well known, although there are indications that it could affect rearfoot and ankle kinematics. These variables have previously been linked to the development of patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) in runners. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the rearfoot and ankle frontal plane kinematics and knee abduction angular impulse between shoes with different torsional stiffness during running.
Methods: Nineteen experienced runners performed heel-toe running at 3.7 m s−1 in three running shoes with different torsional stiffness. Using surface-mounted markers and a force plate, the kinematics and kinetics of the rearfoot, ankle and knee were measured. Torsion, rearfoot and ankle eversion, tibial rotation, knee abduction impulse, and vertical ground reaction force (GRF) peak were compared between footwear conditions using repeated-measures ANOVA.
Results: The torsion angle was significantly different between shoes but none of the other variables showed a difference between conditions. Focusing only on the part of the stance phase with forefoot–ground contact, significant differences were reported in the range of motion (ROM) of rearfoot and ankle eversion. The differences in torsional stiffness of the running shoes did not alter the rearfoot/ankle kinematics or the knee angular impulse, which are variables that have been described as risk factors for PFPS.
Conclusions: During heel-toe running, the shoe torsional stiffness does not seem to have an effect on the injury risk for PFPS. However, there are indications that, for movements performed mainly on the forefoot, this shoe characteristic could have relevance.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank adidas AG for providing the footwear used in this study.