237
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Footstrike pattern at the 10 km and 39 km points of the Singapore marathon in recreational runners

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 43-53 | Received 06 Jan 2020, Accepted 13 Jul 2020, Published online: 10 Aug 2020
 

Abstract

The prevalence of rearfoot striking is ∼60% in elite marathoners, but ∼90% in North American and European recreational marathoners. Recent data indicate that this prevalence is ∼70% in Asian recreational marathoners. How this prevalence changes throughout the course of a marathon remains undocumented. We filmed 350 runners at the 10 km and 39 km marks of the Singapore marathon (∼71% Asian field), and classified footstrike patterns in 347 and 327 runners at these locations. The prevalence of rearfoot, midfoot, forefoot, and asymmetric patterns was 65%, 21%, 33%, and 11% at 10 km, which differed significantly from the corresponding 77%, 15%, 1%, and 8% at 39 km (p < 0.01). The prevalence of non-rearfoot strikers at both filming locations was greater than reported in the literature for North American recreational marathoners (p < 0.01), but lower than reported for non-Asian elite marathoners (p ≤ 0.02). The 12% increase in rearfoot strikers at the later mark of the marathon in our Asian cohort of recreational runners was greater than the 5% increase reported for the North American-based cohort (p < 0.01), but comparable to the one reported for non-Asian elite runners (p = 0.97). Our findings confirm previous conclusions that running research should consider and report ethnicity alongside performance standards given that both can (in part) explain biomechanical differences in running gait. Noteworthy is that numerous factors can influence marathon performance and fatigue that here remained unaccounted for, including age, sex, course profile, footwear, and environmental conditions.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr Christopher Martyn Beaven for assistance during the data collection process.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 340.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.