632
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Migration assessment and the ‘threshold of toxicological concern’ applied to the safe design of an acrylic adhesive for food-contact laminates

, & ORCID Icon
Pages 1721-1729 | Received 09 Dec 2016, Accepted 14 Mar 2017, Published online: 07 Apr 2017
 

ABSTRACT

The suitability of an acrylic adhesive used on food packaging was studied. Six potential migrants were identified using GC-MS and UPLC-QTOF. Five compounds were intentionally added (2-butoxyethanol and 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol 10 (TMDD) and TMDD ethoxylates). One of the compounds identified as 2-(12-(methacryloyloxy) dodecyl)malonic acid was a non -intentionally added substance (NIAS), which could be a methyl metacrylate derivative. A migration study from multilayers containing paper–adhesive–film was carried out. The films used were polyethylene (PE), polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, polylactic acid (PLA) and Ecovio F2223®, which is a mixture of biodegradable polyester with PLA. All the non-volatile compounds, including the identified NIAS, migrated into the dry food simulant Tenax ®. Five surfactants based on TMDD were found to migrate from all laminates into Tenax at levels from 0.05 to 0.6 mg kg–1. The results showed that the lowest migration (0.01 mg kg–1 for 2-(12-(methacryloyloxy)dodecyl)malonic acid to 0.07 for TMDD mg kg–1) occurred when the compounds passed through PLA, demonstrating its functional barrier properties to these compounds. In contrast, PE showed the worst barrier properties to these compounds. To evaluate the migration results, the threshold of toxicological concern strategy was applied. The migration values of the surfactant identified were above 0.09 mg kg–1. Thus, it was decided to remove this surfactant from the formulation.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Samtack (Barcelona, Spain) for the samples supplied for this work.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Gobierno de Aragón and FOndo Social Europeo [grant number Grupo GUIA T-10]. Also the authors acknowledge Samtack for partial finance of the research. The UPLC-QTOF equipment was acquired with the help of FEDER funds.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 799.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.