Correction

This article refers to:

Tiered intake assessment for low- and no-calorie sweeteners in beverages

Article title: Tiered intake assessment for low- and no-calorie sweeteners in beverages

Authors: Tran N.L., Barraj L.M., Hearty AP, & Jack M.M.

Journal: Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A

Bibliometrics: Volume 38, Number 02, page 210

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2020.1843717

Table 2 in Vol 38 on page 210 should be replaced by the corrected version shown below.

Table 2. Proportion of respective LNCS-sweetened beverage types (based on U.S. market volume) containing specified LNCS.

LNCS	LNCS- CSD	LNCS- Juice drink	LNCS- Powder	LNCS- Sports drinks	LNCS- Energy drinks	LNCS- RTD Tea	LNCS- Water-based bev	LNCS- RTD coffee	LNCS- Tea	LNCS- Coffee	LNCS- Other (14.1.5)
Acesulfame potassium	89.6	70.1	100.0	98.4	96.4	93.5	76.6	93.5	93.5	93.5	93.5
Aspartame	96.6	36.2	85.1	0.0	27.5	93.5	40.4	93.5	93.5	93.5	93.5
Saccharin^a	67.0	56.4	64.4	49.6	50.5	94.0	69.6	94.0	94.0	94.0	94.0
Steviol glycosides	13.0	35.9	29.2	0.0	3.7	89.0	77.1	89.0	89.0	89.0	89.0
Sucralose	68.7	83.5	43.4	100.0	74.4	100.0	84.2	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0

LNCS: Low- and no-calorie sweetener sweetened; CSD: Carbonated Soft Drinks; RTD: Ready-to-Drink.

^a Based on average of other 4 LNCS to maintain conservatism.