128
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Possibility of improvement of boiler water treatment process—ion exchange vs. reverse osmosis

, , , , , & show all
Pages 518-524 | Received 29 Feb 2012, Accepted 18 Jul 2012, Published online: 17 Aug 2012
 

Abstract

The boiler water in certain power plant is produced by chemical decarbonization, sand filtration, and ion exchange. Process ends with mixed bed ion exchange. The current boiler water treatment process is analyzed in terms of achieved water quality, quantity and quality of wastewater, and amount of chemicals needed. The main disadvantage of current process is consumption of large amount of chemicals. Ion exchange process could be replaced with the reverse osmosis, but pretreatment (decarbonization and filtration) should be retained. Since the permeate quality does not meet quality requirements, it would be advisable to use mixed bed ion exchange. If reverse osmosis is used, quantity of water that enters the treatment and wastewater would be for about 17.5 and 150% larger, respectively, but content of salt in wastewater would be about 20–30-fold less. Nevertheless, final decision on which technique to apply should be based on further economical considerations.

Notes

Presented at the International Conference on Desalination for the Environment, Clean Water and Energy, European Desalination Society, 23–26 April 2012, Barcelona, Spain

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.