148
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Comparison of preconcentration and determination methods of a textile dye by spectrophotometry: cloud point extraction and solid-phase extraction

, , &
Pages 14965-14972 | Received 19 Dec 2014, Accepted 23 Jun 2015, Published online: 11 Jul 2015
 

Abstract

This study deals with the preconcentration, determination, and removal of Lanaset Blue 2R textile dye from aqueous medium by two different methods. For this purpose, cloud point extraction (CPE) and solid phase extraction (SPE) methods were optimized. Amberlite XAD-1180 resin was used as adsorbent for SPE while Tergitol NP-7 non-ionic surfactant was used as surfactant rich phase for CPE. The common optimization steps were determined as initial solution pH, linear dynamic range, sample volume, equilibrium time and limits of detections were characterized for both SPE and CPE techniques while specific optimization steps such as temperature and surfactant concentration were also determined for CPE. The results showed that the CPE and SPE of dye were quantitative at pH 6. Detection limits were 21-μg L−1 for CPE and 9-μg L−1 for SPE. The enrichment factors were 40 and 10 for SPE and CPE, respectively. The real sample analysis was successfully performed with both techniques. The strengths and weaknesses of the methods were highlighted.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank to Nigde University Research Project Units for their financial support (FEB 2014/14).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.