A comparative study between infinite slope model and Bishop’s method for the shallow slope stability evaluation

Abstract

Comparative analyses were performed to discuss the difference between the shallow slope safety coefficient calculation method deduced from the infinite slope model (ISM) and the Bishop method to figure out the difference of calculation results between the two different methods for engineering evaluation. The location of the potential slip surface and the factor of safety (FS) based on the same analytical conditions calculated by the two different methods are used as the comparative index. The potential slip surface obtained by ISM is shallower than that obtained by the Bishop method. The FS calculated by ISM is also smaller than that obtained by the Bishop method. While the differences are gradually reduced or even reversed with the increase of the slope inclination, the length to thickness ratio (L/H) of the soil layer, the rainfall intensity and the antecedent rainfall duration, respectively. The critical slip surface location calculated by the ISM is shallower than that of the Bishop method when the L/H is below 5, and deeper when L/H is around 10.

Keywords:

• Shallow landslide
• infinite slope model
• factor of safety
• Bishop method
• comparative analysis

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the CRSRI Open Research Program [number CKWV2016390/KY]; Open Fund of Engineering Research Center of Catastrophic Prophylaxis and Treatment of Road & Traffic Safety of Ministry of Education (Changsha University of Science & Technology) under Grant [number KFJ160403] and Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for Postgraduate under Grant [number CX2017B055].