120
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Correction

Correction

This article refers to:
Flexible barrier and flow-driven woody debris: an experimental investigation of their interaction

Article title: Flexible barrier and flow-driven woody debris: an experimental investigation of their interaction

Authors: Stéphane Lambert, Firmin Fontaine and Guillaume Piton

Journal: European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2023.2268706

There were a few inadvertent errors when the article was initially published online. Please refer to the following list of changes:

  1. Initially, and were interchanged in the published version of the article. The correct versions of and are as follows:

    Figure 7. Main measurements during the test with mixture 3B, with a 4% flume inclination and supplying logs in three times (test 3B_4.3).

    Figure 7. Main measurements during the test with mixture 3B, with a 4% flume inclination and supplying logs in three times (test 3B_4.3).

    Figure 8. Backwater rise, h* (left) and elongation at barrier mid-height (right) with a flume inclined by 2 and 6% and supplying mixture 3B in one or seven times and comparison with the reference case (3B_4.3).

    Figure 8. Backwater rise, h* (left) and elongation at barrier mid-height (right) with a flume inclined by 2 and 6% and supplying mixture 3B in one or seven times and comparison with the reference case (3B_4.3).

  2. On page 1, Introduction, first paragraph, line 6, added comma after ‘reduced width’.

  3. The caption of Figure 2 should read:

    Figure 2. Woody debris trapped in flexible barriers in New Zealand (a) and in the USA (b) (courtesy of Geobrugg and KANE GeoTech inc, respectively) and in the preliminary flume experiments with a smaller net with thin logs with a smaller net with thin logs (c) and thick logs (d).

  4. Page 7, the first line after Eq. (4), ‘Fr0’ is changed to ‘Fr0

  5. Page 7, third paragraph of Results section, line 1, ‘…near the barrier was mostly horizontal…’ is changed to ‘…near the barrier were mostly horizontal…’

  6. Page 13, Fourth paragraph, line 9, ‘…resulting in a higher barrier the elongation…’ is changed to ‘….resulting in a higher barrier elongation…’

  7. Page 14, first paragraph, line 5, ‘…It is also in line with the fact the permittivity stopped….’to ‘…It is also in line with the fact that permittivity stopped…’

  8. The caption of Figure. 16 should read:

    Figure 16. Normalised loading at barrier mid-height at maximum discharge. Four mixtures (3B, 1A, 2A and 6B) supplied according to modes 1–1, 1–3 and 1–7 in the flume inclined by 2, 4 and 6%.

Furthermore, the original article has been amended with above corrections and republished online.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.