203
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Is split-thickness skin graft safe for coverage of the vascular pedicle in free tissue transfer?

&
Pages 138-142 | Received 03 Apr 2018, Accepted 02 Nov 2018, Published online: 24 Jan 2019
 

Abstract

Introduction: If the pedicle is compressed after microanastomosis during free flap reconstruction, additional tissue such as skin graft or vascularized flap is needed to avoid tension. Performing a skin graft directly on the vessel might cause considerable problems. We aimed to analyze the safety of skin grafting on the anastomosis site of the free flap.

Patients and methods: A total of 15 patients who underwent skin grafting on the anastomosis site were analyzed. The skin graft take-up rate and flap-related complications were evaluated postoperatively.

Results: All involved sites were the extremities (10 hands and 5 feet). An anterolateral thigh free flap in six patients and a toe pulp free flap in nine patients were harvested. The mean follow-up period was 10.4 ± 6.2 months. The graft area for the pedicle was 2.8 ± 1.6 cm2. The percentage of final graft take was 99.3 ± 1.2% at 30 days postoperatively without flap compromise.

Conclusion: During free flap surgery in the upper or lower extremities, inadequate pedicle coverage may occur easily. Applying a split-thickness skin graft in such cases can be safe and one of the simple methods.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.