2,143
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Memory bias for threatening information related to anxiety: an updated meta-analytic review

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 832-854 | Received 11 May 2016, Accepted 07 Apr 2017, Published online: 24 Apr 2017
 

ABSTRACT

The evidence for an anxiety-related memory bias is contradictory. We compiled 171 articles published until October 2016 including a group with clinical or subclinical anxiety and a control group in tasks involving implicit or explicit memory using threatening stimuli. There was an anxiety-related memory bias in free recall tasks, but it was not observed in another memory task. The between-groups differences showed that the anxious group recalled more threatening stimuli than the control group (d = 0.321). When we compared the group differences (anxious vs. control participants) in the within-groups effect (threatening vs. neutral stimuli), a moderate effect size emerged (dbw = 0.714). This anxiety-related memory bias was observed with shallow processing, that is consistent with attentional biases related to anxiety. There was also evidence that high-anxious persons recall fewer positive stimuli. Future research is needed to investigate whether this result is a memory or encoding bias and explore other moderator variables.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 Among the studies included, there are outlier effect sizes that could be increasing the combined effect size (the studies of Johnson, Craske & Aikins, Citation2008; Russo, Fox, Bellinger, & Nguyen-Van-Tam, Citation2001; Russo et al., Citation2006). When these outliers are excluded from the analysis, the effect size is still significant (d = 0.21, 95% CI [0.12, 0.29]).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Plan for Scientific Research, Development and Technological Innovation 2008-2011, Ministry of Science and Innovation (Spain) 2008–2011, Ministry of Science and Innovation (Spain) [grant number PSI2008-02338/PSIC], [grant number PSI2012-36546]; and MINECO (Spain) Excellence Network PROMOSAM [grant number PSI2014-56303-REDT], Excellence Network PROMOSAM. Research on Processes, Mechanisms and Psychological Treatment for the Promotion of Mental Health.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 298.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.