Factors affecting the acquisition and retention of employment among individuals with intellectual disabilities

Abstract

This study analyzed factors affecting the acquisition and retention of employment among individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID). These factors were verified according to job type and were classified into general characteristics, family-related factors, psychological factors, and abilities. Data from 398 individuals with ID were analyzed using chi-square tests, independent t-tests, and regression analyses using the second wave of the first year Panel Survey of Employment for the Disabled in Korea. We found significant differences in sex, education level, receipt of basic living security assistance, transportation use, household income level, and family support between employed and unemployed participants. Additionally, the employed (vs. unemployed) ID group had significantly higher scores for all variables related to psychological factors and abilities. Factors affecting employment among individuals with ID included age, education level, receipt of basic living security assistance, family support, and vocational ability. Older age, higher education level, absence of basic living security assistance, greater family support, and higher vocational ability were associated with a higher probability of current employment. Transportation use and parents’ education were associated with a high probability of non-manufacturing-type jobs. Being married, absence of basic living security assistance, greater householder income level, family support, and manufacturing industry work were associated with increased job retention. Consequently, modifying the benefit system and developing family support systems may promote employment acquisition and retention among people with ID. Efforts are also needed to expand the job types available to individuals with ID.

Keywords:

• Intellectual disabilities
• employment
• job maintaining
• job type

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding: Not applicable.

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval: All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent: This study used secondary data; however, all participants originally provided informed consent.