3,566
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Discussion papers

‘Environments of concern’: reframing challenging behaviour within a human rights approach

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 95-100 | Received 01 Apr 2022, Accepted 24 Aug 2022, Published online: 01 Feb 2023
 

Abstract

While disability is recognised by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) as an evolving concept, the language of positive behaviour support has not kept pace with the current human rights-based approach. The widely-used terms ‘challenging behaviour’ and ‘behaviours that challenge’ imply that the behaviour is inherent in a person with disability. Words have power in shaping practice: when the behaviour of the person with disability is framed as the problem, this leads to a pathologisation or labelling that can provide a rationale to medicate and restrain as a way of ‘managing the challenging behaviour’. Many behaviours seen as being challenging could be better understood as ‘adaptive behaviours to maladaptive environments’, or legitimate responses to difficult environments and situations. In this paper, we argue that the language and implementation of positive behaviour support should better take into account the CRPD and contemporary evidence on behaviour change interventions, which support a shift away from focusing on individuals’ behaviours towards putting environments front and centre. We outline how the social-ecological model could be used as a framework to more explicitly address ‘environments of concern’ in developing tailored and system-wide responses to behaviour support needs. We argue there is an urgency for this paradigm shift to better reflect the views of people with disability and improve outcomes.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Navin Govinda Raj for his assistance with literature review.

Disclosure statement

Authors MJ and JC are employed by the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission. No other potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 We acknowledge that some people prefer the term ‘disabled person’ (PWDA 2021), to reflect that society disables a person rather than disability being inherent to a person.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 184.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.