Achieving accurate laboratory diagnosis of typhoid fever: a review and meta-analysis of TUBEX® TF clinical performance

ABSTRACT

This review discusses currently available serological diagnostic methods for typhoid fever with a focus on the clinical utility of TUBEX® TF as an alternative to the Widal or Typhidot test. A literature search was conducted in PubMed for related publications written in English. A qualitative analysis was done to determine various serological tests used for typhoid fever diagnosis with emphasis on TUBEX® TF in comparison to the Widal of Typhidot test. Further, a meta-analysis was performed to obtain a pooled estimate of diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) using different analysis models. A total of sixteen studies was included in the qualitative analysis. Further screening of these studies yielded ten studies that were used for the meta-analysis. The sensitivity/specificity range of different commonly used serological tests in typhoid patients is between 55-100%/58-100% for TUBEX® TF, 54-67%/54-95% for Typhidot, and 32-95%/4-98% for the Widal test. As for the pooled meta-analysis estimates, the TUBEX® TF showed superior results when differentiating individuals with febrile illness of unknown origin from those with typhoid fever. Overall, the results of this review and meta-analysis suggest that the TUBEX® TF is more advantageous to use as a serological test for typhoid fever diagnosis due its accuracy and simplicity. However, further studies are still needed to validate our results.

KEYWORDS:

• Serological test
• Widal test
• TUBEX® TF
• typhoid fever
• Salmonella Typhi
• sensitivity
• specificity
• meta-analysis

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.