235
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Perceptions of the SARS-CoV2 pandemic: a small comparative survey analysis between language preference populations in a United States community health center

ORCID Icon, , , , , , & show all
Pages 203-211 | Published online: 17 Jun 2022
 

ABSTRACT

In 2019, a new variant of coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) created a global pandemic that has highlighted and exacerbated health disparities. Educating the general public about COVID-19 is one of the primary mitigation strategies amongst health professionals. English is not the preferred language for an estimated 22% of the United States population making effective mass communication efforts difficult to achieve. This study seeks to understand and compare several topics surrounding COVID-19 health communication and healthcare disparities between individuals with English language preference (ELP) and non-English language preference (NELP) within the United States. A survey available in seven languages asking about knowledge and opinions on COVID-19, vaccines, preferred sources of health information, and other questions, was administered February-April 2021 to patients at an urban federally qualified health center that also serves global refugees and immigrants. Descriptive statistics and comparative analysis were performed to identify differences between ELP and NELP individuals. Analysis of 144 surveys, 33 of which were NELP, showed 90.97% of all patients agreed that COVID-19 was a serious disease and 66.67% would receive the COVID-19 vaccine. There were numerous differences between ELP and NELP individuals, including trust in government, symptom identification, preferred source of health information, and feelings that cultural needs had been met. This study has identified several significant differences in patient perceptions relating to the COVID-19 pandemic when comparing NELP to ELP and highlighted areas where improvement can occur. Applying this information, easily utilized targeted resources can be created to quickly intervene and address health disparities among patients seeking care at an urban community health center.

Abbreviations

ELP: English language preference; NELP: non-English language preference; CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; FQHC: Federally Qualified Health Center

Ethical Approval and Consent to participate

This study was submitted and approved by Wright State University’s Institutional Review Board (IRB #: SC6006, OHRP #: IRB00000034) prior to study initiation. Once approved, participants consented to the survey and publication of deidentified information.

Consent for Publication

All authors consented to publication

Availability of Data

Most data generated from this study are included in the published article, remaining data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Authors’ contributions

All authors read and approved the final manuscript

CE: Study design, analysis, interpretation of data, drafted the work, substantively revised work, correspondence

SR: Study design, analysis, interpretation of data, and substantively revised work

JD: Study design, interpretation of data, and substantively revised work

MG: Data acquisition, interpretation of data, and substantively revised work

EVM: Data acquisition, interpretation of data, and substantively revised work

KC: Study design, analysis, interpretation of data, and substantively revised work

PH: Study design, analysis, interpretation of data, and substantively revised work

TC: Analysis, interpretation of data, substantively revised work

Correction Statement

This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Additional information

Funding

This publication was supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration T0BHP30029 (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of an award totaling $499,427 with 0% financed with nongovernmental sources. The contents are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of, nor an endorsement, by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 346.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.