237
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Executive functions and working memory capacity in speech communication under adverse conditions

, &
Pages 218-226 | Published online: 29 Jun 2016
 

Abstract

Introduction: Working memory is assumed to play a major part in hearing and communication in everyday listening situations. Our working memory stores information, but in suboptimal listening conditions, interfering stimuli can lead to information only being partially stored, or even missed. Research suggests that a high working memory capacity (WMC) might not just be a result of a large store, but in addition good inhibitory control can facilitate working memory, and therefore aid in situations where focus on a target stimulus while ignoring distractors is needed.

Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate how individual WMC, cognitive inhibition, and lexical decision relate to listening to speech under adverse conditions in two separate groups: 46 young normally hearing (NH) and 40 elderly hearing-impaired (HI) individuals.

Results: It showed that lexical access was of little importance for young NH individuals in a speech-in-noise test, but that high lexical decision-making was associated with lower signal-to-noise ratios for the elderly HI individuals. The results also showed that WMC was of importance for word recognition in a speech-in-noise test for elderly participants, when the 80% word recognition criterion was targeted, but not for the young NH individuals. Finally, results suggest that cognitive inhibition, as measured with the Hayling task, was important for young NH individuals when listening conditions are suboptimal.

Conclusion: In conclusion, hearing loss is a strong contributing factor to declines in the ability to recognize speech in noise, and in order to assess speech-recognition-in-noise performance, individual differences in WMC and cognitive inhibition should be taken into consideration. Future research should include various age groups, with and without hearing loss, as well as measures of WMC, cognitive inhibition, and lexical access when assessing the ability to listen to speech under adverse conditions.

Disclaimer statements

Contributors Victoria Stenbäck: Conceiving and designing the study, obtaining funding and/or ethics approval, Collecting half the data, analyzing the data, interpreting the data, writing the article in whole or in part and revising the article. Mathias Hällgren: Collecting half the data, analyzing the data and revising the article. Birgitta Larsby: Obtaining funding and ethics approval, analyzing the data and revising the manuscript.

Funding None.

Conflict of interest The authors report no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval The research was approved by the regional ethics committee in Linköping, Sweden, in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki (Dnr: CM83-06; 2012/105-31).

ORCiD

Victoria Stenbäck http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0369-3354

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 283.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.