155
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Content Analysis of Major Textbooks and Online Resources Used in Responsible Conduct of Research Instruction

, , , &
Pages 42-46 | Published online: 14 Apr 2011
 

Abstract

Instruction in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) is required for all trainees funded by the National Institues of Health (NIH) or National Science Foundation (NSF). A recent Delphi study identified 53 key topics in 7 core areas that RCR education experts felt should be included in this instruction, which is required of many trainees in clinical and translational research. We performed a content analysis of major textbooks and online resources used in RCR instruction to determine the extent to which the 53 key topics identified in the Delphi study are covered by these resources. Textbooks and online resources used in RCR education at Clinical and Translational Science Award institutions were identified via survey. These resources were subjected to a content analysis. The 53 key topics identified in the Delphi study formed the basis of these analyses. We identified 10 textbooks and 1 online resource currently in use. Of the 53 key topics, only 4 were included in all 11 resources, and another 12 were included in 10. Twenty-three topics were covered in fewer than 65% of the resources, and two topics were absent from nearly all. Educators in clinical and translational research should be aware of key topics that are not covered in the RCR textbooks and online resources they may use and should consider augmenting discussion of such topics with other materials.

Acknowledgments

This project was conducted by members of the Educational Materials Group of the NIH CTSA Consortium's Clinical Research Ethics Key Function Committee (CC-CRE-KFC). This project was funded primarily by an administrative supplement to the CC-CRE-KFC, grant 3UL1 RR024146-03S2 (administered by the University of California–Davis) with further support from grants UL1 RR024146, UL1 RR024992, 1UL1 RR024975, and 1UL1 RR024986-01. Drs. Steneck and Heitman are each authors of textbooks included in this content analysis, which we believe represent conflicts of interest that should be disclosed to readers. The views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not represent the official position of the United States government, NIH, ORI, DoD, or DoN.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 137.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.