428
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
 

Abstract

Questions about when to limit unhelpful treatments are often raised in general medicine but are less commonly considered in psychiatry. Here we describe a survey of U.S. psychiatrists intended to characterize their attitudes about the management of suicidal ideation in patients with severely treatment-refractory illness. Respondents (n = 212) received one of two cases describing a patient with suicidal ideation due to either borderline personality disorder or major depressive disorder. Both patients were described as receiving all guideline-based and plausible emerging treatments. Respondents rated the expected helpfulness and likelihood of recommending each of four types of intervention: hospitalization, additional medication changes, additional neurostimulation, and additional psychotherapy. Across both cases, most respondents said they were likely to provide each intervention, except for additional neurostimulation in borderline personality disorder, while fewer thought each intervention would be helpful. Substantial minorities of respondents indicated that they would provide an intervention they did not think was likely to be helpful. Our results suggest that while most psychiatrists recognize the possibility that some patients are unlikely to be helped by available treatments, many would continue to offer such treatments.

This article is referred to by:
What Is Futility in Psychiatry?
On Changes and Opportunities at AJOB Neuroscience
Treatment-Resistant Psychiatric Conditions and the Ethics of Psychiatric Physician-Aid-in-Dying
Hope in the Face of “Futility”: Considering the Full Scope of Psychiatric Treatment Options
Psychiatric Care When Cure Is No Longer the Goal: A Call for Expansion of Management Options for Treatment-Resistant Mental Illness
Humanizing Patients and Their Needs Might Affect Psychiatrists’ Thinking about Futility

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank Oprah Garrett and Meredith Trejo for administrative assistance with the study. The authors would also like to thank Roxanne Bartel, Wilbur Dattilo, and Benjamin Lewis for their assistance in reviewing the cases presented.

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by a Greenwall Foundation Faculty Scholars Program Fellowship (BMK). The Greenwall Foundation also funded the Philosophical Bioethics Seminar Series where the study team discussed many of the normative issues prompting this study.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 137.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.