574
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The development of hospital financial accounting in the USA

&
Pages 201-217 | Received 17 Jan 2014, Accepted 10 Jul 2015, Published online: 15 Sep 2015
 

Abstract

This paper examines the history of financial accounting in American hospitals from the turn of the twentieth century to the present. It argues that, prior to the 1970s, the financial accounting practices of hospitals differed significantly from their counterparts in the business world as health-service organisations, institutions and legislation rather than accounting bodies and standards were the principal influence on their development. The paper moreover argues that the increasing influence of the Financial Accounting Standards Board on financial accounting in American hospitals has resulted in a growing convergence between accounting practices in hospitals and the wider economy since the early 1970s.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1. Some would argue that SFAS No. 32, which affirmed the acceptability of AICPA Statements of Position and Industry Audit Guides, was the first FASB pronouncement dealing with NFPs. SFAS No. 32 cited 26 Statements of Position, four industry accounting guides, and 14 Industry Audit Guides as being acceptable. These included Financial Accounting and Reporting by Hospitals Operated by a Governmental Unit, Accounting Principles and Reporting Practices for Certain Nonprofit Organizations, and Hospital Audit Guide.

2. It is interesting to note that after being frustrated with the development of accounting standards in Canada, the Accounting Standards Authority of Canada also tried to institute a competing standard-setting body to the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants’ Accounting Standards Board. Its efforts, however, were short-lived (1981–1998) after encountering numerous obstacles (Richardson Citation2011).

3. Legal enforceability is not required to recognise an asset or liability. SFAC No. 6 states that although the ability of an entity to obtain benefit from an asset and to control others’ access to it generally rests on a foundation of legal rights, legal enforceability of a claim to the benefit is not a prerequisite for a benefit to qualify as an asset if the entity has the ability to obtain and control the benefit in other ways.

4. Voluntary health and welfare organisations received the majority of their revenues from donor contributions rather than from charging patients for services performed.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 497.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.