ABSTRACT
This review of literature articulates how the ‘free-play’ street soccer environment creates the context for athletes to thrive in sport, while simultaneously minimizing the injury risks associated with such activity. Williams’ and Andersen's well-known model of stress and athletic injury outlines how athletes’ cognitive and physiological responses to potentially stressful athletic situations can influence sport injuries. This ‘stress response’ is influenced by the personality, history with stressors, and coping resources that athletes bring to the environment. Wiese-Bjornstal furthered theory in this domain by developing the biopsychosocial sport injury risk profile. Her framework identifies potential antecedents to injury that emerge across four categories, each of which holds various levels of risk exposure, risk behavior, and vulnerability to injury: biological, physical, psychological, and sociological. These models provided the framework for this narrative. Specifically, given its psychosocial nature, the free-play street soccer environment may act as a protective sport activity design insofar as it mitigates against known injury risk antecedents. Hence, the inherent risk mitigation of free-play, taken together with the potential it has to create psychological, physiological, and technical development among young people, support greater emphasis on street soccer as a powerful construct for youth development in the game of soccer.
KEYWORDS:
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Jeffrey A. Frykholm
Dr. Jeff Frykholm is the Executive Director of the non-profit Center for Positive Youth Development in Sports. In addition to a previous academic career in the field of Education, Dr. Frykholm has extensive experience, leadership expertise, and an emerging research agenda in the areas of youth and college sports, coaching, coaching education, and the development of free-play environments.