200
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Neoclassical Economic Fiction and Neoliberal Political Reality: Criticism of the “Single Thought” in Political Economics

Pages 98-107 | Published online: 25 Mar 2013
 

Abstract

We can observe today the domination of a certain current of thought in economic theory, which can provisionally be characterized as the “neoclassical–neoliberal–orthodox” mainstream. However, in a field where the confrontation of theoretical referents is inherent to the work of the researcher, is such consensual thinking, or “single thought” even thinkable?

Notes

1The very different treatment of the concept of infinity in philosophy (ever since the head-on clash of the paradoxes of Zeno and the paralogisms of Aristotle's Physics) and mathematics (from Leibniz and Newton's differential calculus to Cantor's transfinite numbers).

2For a presentation of this debate, see Herrera (Citation2001, Citation2010a).

3See, respectively, Greenspan (2007), Soros (Citation2008), and Stiglitz (Citation2006).

4Reread what the “gnawing criticism of the mice” has left of their German Ideology (Marx and Engels Citation1947).

5For a definition of “high finance” from a Marxist point of view, see Herrera (Citation2010b, 102–4).

6Sometimes, this support is also supra-national. The World Bank actually took off under Robert McNamara's mandate at its head—after he had personally taken care of Vietnam's “development” as US Secretary of Defence.

7By classics, we mean the “scientific” economists (beginning with Petty and Boisguilbert); and by liberals, the thinkers of the liberal society (from Hume, Smith, Turgot).

8See, for example, Kirman Citation(1992) or Malinvaud Citation(1996). On this point, see Herrera Citation(2006a).

9A typical example is provided by Jevons (Citation1888, 239–41), attributing the paternity of utility-value to Ricardo in the last part (“The Origin of Value”) of chapter IV of his Theory of Political Economy. The rescue of the law of comparative advantages by neoclassical advocates of free trade is another one.

10The mainstream logical, deductive diagrams are opposed by Wallerstein (Citation2001, 151–52): “the present determines the past, and not the opposite.”

11Let us mention just one example. In his famous Theory of Political Economy, William S. Jevons (Citation1888, 55) wrote: “I contend that all economic writers must be mathematical so far as they are scientific at all.” Then, “The theoretical conception of a perfect market is more or less completely carried out in practice” (153). And, last but not least: “It is evident that questions of this kind depend greatly upon the character of the race. Persons of an energetic disposition feel labour less painfully than their fellowmen, and, if they happen to be endowed with various and acute sensibilities, their desire of further acquisition never ceases. A man of lower race, a negro for instance, enjoys possession less, and loathes labour more” (263).

12Read here the preface to von Mises' (1951, 11) book Socialism: “But just because they cannot think for themselves, the masses follow the lead of the people we call educated. Once convince these, and the game is won.”

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 181.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.