338
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Book Reviews

Imperialism: Necessary and Beneficial?—Review of the Works of Hobson, Weber, and Schumpeter

Pages 86-97 | Published online: 11 Mar 2014
 

Abstract

Proponents of imperialism claim that imperialism is beneficial and necessary. J. A. Hobson, Max Weber, and Joseph Schumpeter have written scholarly critiques in which they question these claims. Hobson argued that imperialism is not only unnecessary, but is pernicious. Weber acknowledged the need for an expansive foreign doctrine, but he suggested that imperialism was neither necessary nor beneficial. Schumpeter argued that the various types of imperialisms were variations on war and he concluded that there were better methods to improve a country's economic standing. The critiques of imperialism by Hobson, Weber, and Schumpeter are noteworthy for a number of reasons, among them, that Weber and Schumpeter knew Hobson's writings well, and that Weber and Schumpeter not only read each other's writings but knew each other personally. All three offer penetrating scholarly critiques that can be used as critical commentaries on contemporary claims for imperialism.

Notes on contributor

Christopher Adair-Toteff is author of 40 articles on German sociology and philosophy. His articles on Max Weber include “Max Weber's Charisma,” “Max Weber's Pericles—The Political Demagogue,” “Max Weber's Mysticism,” and “The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Politics.” His Sociological Beginnings was published by Liverpool University Press in 2005. He has taught extensively, including as Associate Professor of philosophy at the American University in Bulgaria. He is Honorary Senior Researcher at the University of Kent, and Fellow at the Center for Social and Political Thought, University of South Florida. Adair-Toteff is writing a book on the theological contexts of Weber's Protestant Ethic.

Notes

1Not everyone is as convinced as Mommsen that Weber was a nationalist. Kari Palonen tries to argue against Mommsen, but he seems to ignore Weber's continued emphasis on culture and he tends to focus on Weber's post-war tendencies (Mommsen Citation1974, 76). Palonen is both a great Weber scholar and a well-respected political theorist, but here he is less than convincing (Palonen Citation2001).

2Swedberg points out in Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung that Schumpeter does not name Marx but has him in mind (Swedberg Citation1991b, 38). Wolfgang Mommsen calls Lenin Schumpeter's “Gegenspieler” (Mommsen Citation1979, 58).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 181.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.