![Sample our Politics & International Relations journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5947/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Politics-International-Relations.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Since Black Lives Matter (BLM) rose to prominence, liberal democracies have been internally divided over their response to the movement. Whilst some politicians have supported BLM’s struggle against anti-black racism, others have condemned it as unnecessary, or even harmful to democracy. China, by contrast, has displayed unwavering solidarity with BLM, by providing it with official coverage and support. In an attempt to discredit these efforts, liberals have portrayed China’s solidarity statements as pragmatic gestures, designed to draw attention away from its alleged human rights violations. This article shows that these accusations are baseless. China’s support for the black liberation struggle precedes BLM; and is rooted in the revolutionary internationalism of its founder, Mao Zedong. Under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, the Chinese state has developed Mao’s Marxist analysis of the African American struggle. In doing so, China has helped BLM expose the racist core of US capitalism.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their help in improving this article.
Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Joe Pateman
Joe Pateman is a postdoctoral research assistant in the School of Politics and International Relations at the University of Nottingham, UK. He is interested in Marxism-Leninism, democratic theory, and black liberation ideologies. His recent publications include Public Libraries and Marxism (Routledge 2021).