ABSTRACT
This paper explores how democracies handle the trade-off between public safety and fundamental democratic principles. We show that an exogenous shock, like the pandemic, creates incentives for governing elites to deploy self-empowering mechanisms to avoid institutional checks and balances – with lasting consequences for democratic performance. We examine this prospect in Italy and Romania. These cases have a long history of institutional gridlock; such history reinforces incentives to work around traditional institutions in responding to the pandemic. While the two cases vary in terms of the quality and resilience of their democratic institutions, we find that elites displayed a similar propensity to overlook the intricate institutional balances during a moment of crisis. In Italy, the executive strengthened its power relative to the legislature; in Romania, the strengthening is relative to the judiciary. This finding has implications in assessing the risk for falling standards of liberal democracy across the European Union.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Veronica Anghel
Veronica Anghel is Lecturer at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies and a Max Weber Fellow in the Political Science Department of the European University Institute.
Erik Jones
Erik Jones is Professor and Director of the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies at the European University Institute and Professor of European Studies and International Political Economy at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies.