Assessing the US sulfur reduction programme in Massachusetts from an environmental justice framework: is there evidence of disproportionality?

ABSTRACT

This study reviews the impact of a sulfur cap-and-trade programme on distributions of sulfur from commercial electricity utility generators within Massachusetts from 1990 thru 2014. The results indicate that sulfur reductions occurred throughout Massachusetts that were proportional, including a targeted study area within the state that meets the operational definition of a marginalized community. While the target study community disproportionately produced more sulfur emissions than surrounding communities, the overall reductions through cap-and-trade were consistent throughout the entire state. Other factors, beyond cap-and-trade, are identified as possible reasons why all areas of the state saw proportional reductions. But aside from those additional factors, the results indicate that cap-and-trade resulted in substantial and proportional reductions of sulfur throughout Massachusetts. This result informs more recent studies at the national level in the United States which show cap-and-trade programmes have the potential to create disproportional impacts, particularly when looking at sulfur emission distributions.

KEYWORDS:

• Cap and trade
• disproportionality
• marginalization
• Massachusetts
• sulfur emissions

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

ORCID

Chad J. McGuire http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2480-4751