![Sample our Area Studies journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5922/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Area-Studies.jpg"})
Abstract
There are powerful symbolic boundaries in urban China that exclude rural migrants. This study identifies and analyzes the new boundary work that aims at remaking these rural-urban boundaries. Based on data on previous cohorts of rural migrants in China and elsewhere, current studies argue that the predominant type of boundary work is personal assimilation. I challenge this finding by documenting how the most recent cohort of young rural migrants develop a broad variety of “normative inversion,” “reclassification,” and “universalistic blurring” types of boundary work. Although this study does not conclusively prove that the new boundary work has already successfully remade rural-urban boundaries, it illustrates that new potential paths to remaking them are opened. Data were mainly collected between 2014 and 2017 through participant observation in dance clubs in Beijing and interviews with fifty-seven dance club service workers.
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Matthew M. Chew
Matthew M. Chew ([email protected]) is an associate professor at the Sociology Department of Hong Kong Baptist University in Hong Kong. His research interests include social theory, cultural sociology, sociology of consumption, media sociology, and sociology of knowledge. He has published numerous articles in the following journals: Current Sociology, International Sociology, The China Quarterly, and New Media and Society.