Abstract
The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) is used to assess risky decision making in clinical and nonclinical populations. Recent studies have begun to assess performance on the IGT not by number of advantageous and disadvantageous selections, but rather by the pattern of performance on each of the four individual decks (A, B, C, and D). The present study sought to further examine deck selection patterns among smoking and nonsmoking college students, as mixed results have been found on the IGT in nicotine and as a function of substance satiation level. Participants were 136 undergraduates (48 male; mean age 19.24 years), of whom 70 were nonsmokers. Thirty-one smokers abstained from smoking overnight. Performance on the IGT was broken into two blocks (Trials 1–40, Trials 41–100) for each of the four decks. Abstinent smokers selected more from Deck A on Block 2 than the ad libitum smokers. No group or block differences were found for Decks B or C. Selections from Deck D increased as the task progressed, regardless of smoking status. Ad libitum smokers preferred Deck B to Deck A on Block 2. The results provide some evidence that nicotine satiation level affects IGT deck selections among smokers.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research was supported in part by grants from the Ohio University Department of Psychology and Ohio University Graduate Student Senate.
Notes
WASI = Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, two-subscale estimated Full-Scale IQ; FTND = Fagerstrom Test of Nicotine Dependence; HONC = Hooked on Nicotine Checklist; QSU = Questionnaire on Smoking Urges; CO = breath carbon monoxide level; IGT = Iowa Gambling Task, percentage of selections by deck type and block.
a Nonsmoker < abstinent and ad libitum smokers, abstinent = ad libitum smokers.
b Nonsmoker < abstinent and ad libitum smokers, abstinent > ad libitum smokers.
c Nonsmoker = abstinent and ad libitum smokers, abstinent > ad libitum smokers.