Notes
1. This resurgence of debates over method is best expressed in Salter and Mutlu (Citation2013) and Aradau et al. (Citation2014).
2. For discourse analysis using detailed thematic coding, see Fairclough (Citation2003) and Fairclough and Fairclough (Citation2012). For more conceptual understandings of discourse analysis, see Hindess (Citation1995) and Howarth, Norval, and Stavrakakis (Citation2000).
3. Here, I am speaking about critical anthropology that emerged out of similar foundational debates in the 1990s, best expressed in Clifford (Citation1988) and Clifford and Marcus (Citation2010).
Salter, M. B., and C. Mutlu, eds. 2013. Research Methods in Critical Security Studies. Abingdon: Routledge. Aradau, C., J. Huysmans, A. Neal, and N. Voelkner, eds. 2014. Critical Security Methods: New Frameworks for Analysis. Abingdon: Routledge. Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Abingdon: Routledge. Fairclough, I., and N. Fairclough. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. Abingdon: Routledge. Hindess, B. 1995. Discourses of Power: From Hobbes to Foucault. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Howarth, D. R., A. J. Norval, and Y. Stavrakakis, eds. 2000. Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Clifford, J. 1988. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press. Clifford, J., and G. Marcus, eds. 2010. The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press. Additional information
Notes on contributors
Debbie Lisle
Debbie Lisle is a Reader in International Relations at Queen’s University Belfast. Her research explores the connections between mobility, security, violence, travel, visuality, culture and materiality.