ABSTRACT
This study examines the protracted Cyprus conflict by employing an Ontological Security Studies (OSS) framework enriched with the Lacanian psychoanalytic approach. In this context, the tripartite structure Lacan established between mother, father, and child is adapted to understand the years-long dispute over Cyprus. We argue that the two main reasons for this problem are 1) the unhealthily broken bond between the mothers (Türkiye and Greece) and the child (Cyprus), and 2) the child’s inability to fully identify with the Name-of-the-Father (the West). Recognising the father’s law, the child is freed from the mother’s overwhelming presence and thus begins the process of subject formation. We assert that global politics shares similarities with what Lacan calls ‘symbolic’ and that Cyprus’ existence as an actor in this ‘symbolic’ depends on its full separation from its mother(s), namely Türkiye and Greece, and by recognising the father’s law. This study raises the question of what happens if this separation is not achieved. In other words, could Cyprus exist as a fully-fledged actor in global politics/symbolic in the shadow of two motherlands, Türkiye and Greece, which have not abandoned their ‘baby homeland’?
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Ceren Melis Kıcıroğlu
Ceren Melis Kıcıroğl is a PhD candidate in Political Science and International Relations at Istanbul University. Her research focuses on international relations theory, Turkish foreign policy and psychoanalytic theory.
Nuri Fudayl Kıcıroğlu
Nuri Fudayl Kıcıroğlu holds a Ph.D. in political science and international relations. His main areas of research are political theory, history of political thought, and political history.