1,040
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Report

Protective capacity of proteoliposomes from Mycobacterium bovis BCG in a mouse model of tuberculosis

, , , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 657-661 | Received 31 Aug 2014, Accepted 20 Nov 2014, Published online: 03 Apr 2015

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the most important causes of mortality and morbidity due to infectious diseases. BCG, the vaccine in use, is not fully protective against TB. In a previous study, we have shown that proteoliposomes (outer membrane extracts), obtained from BCG (PLBCG) were able to induce humoral immune responses against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) antigens. With the objective to evaluate the protective capability of PLBCG alone or as a booster with BCG, a murine model of progressive pulmonary TB was used. Animals immunized with PLBCG adjuvanted with alum (PLBCG-Al) showed similar protection to that conferred by BCG. The group immunized with PLBCG-Al as a booster to BCG gave superior protection than BCG as evidenced by a reduction of bacterial load in lungs 2 months after infection with Mtb. Animals immunized with BCG, PLBCG-Al and this formulation as a booster of BCG, showed a significant decrease of tissue damage (percentage of pneumonic area/lung) compared with non-immunized animals. These results demonstrate that immunization with PLBCG-Al alone or as a booster to BCG induce appropriate protection against challenge with Mtb in mice and support the future evaluation of PLBCG as a promising vaccine candidate against Mtb.

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the most important causes of mortality and morbidity due to infectious diseases.Citation1–5 Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is the current vaccine approved for human use against TB.Citation1-5 It is most effective in protecting children from the severe forms of the disease; while its efficacy in adults is poor especially against pulmonary TB.Citation1-5 It has been suggested that boosting of the primary BCG vaccination may produce enhanced protection against TB.Citation4,5 Many studies support the role of mycobacterial cell wall components in the development of TB pathogenesis and therefore have been a prime target for the identification and characterization of antigens with potential application in vaccine development.Citation6-9 Proteoliposomes (PL) are detergent outer membrane extracts of bacteria that contain proteins, lipids and native lipopolysaccharides.Citation10 Only a few PL-based vaccines are licensed, one of them, VA-MENGOC-BC®, is a vaccine composed of PL obtained from the outer membrane of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B.Citation11 This PL has been shown to have high efficacy in controlling meningococcal disease and exhibited adjuvant effect when used with other antigens.Citation11,12 BCG has high genome and antigenic homology to that of Mtb.Citation13-15 We reported that PLBCG induced humoral immune responses against Mtb antigens in mice.Citation16 In this study, we evaluated the protective effect of PLBCG in a murine model of intratracheal infection and its potential use as a booster to BCG vaccination.

Materials and Methods

Organism

BCG Moreau strain, (Enterprise of Production of Biologicals, Carlos J Finlay, La Habana, Cuba).

PLBCG

The BCG culture was centrifuged at 17,700 × g for 30 min at 4°C. After two washes, the pellet was resuspended in buffer solution (30 mM Tris, 2 mM EDTA, pH 8.5) in the presence of sodium deoxycholate [5-15% (w/v)] (0.1-0.25 ml/g biomass). One hour later, the sample was centrifuged as above and the supernatant collected and ultracentrifuged at 50,000-70,000 ×g for 2-8 h at 4°C. Finally the pellet was resuspended in buffer solution, filtered (Sartorius Minisart-plus 0.45 and 0.2 μm filters) and stored at 4°C. Characterization was carried out as described.Citation16,17

Animals

Sixteen male Balb/c mice (6-8 weeks) were used in this study. The animals were kept in special boxes coupled to a negative-pressure micro-isolator.

Challenge study

Protection induced by the PLBCG was evaluated against Mtb infection in mice. Mice were distributed in 4 groups (n = 4 ) and were inoculated subcutaneously with 100 μL of the following inocula: PBS, BCG (106 CFU of BCG, single inoculation), PLBCG-Al [50 μg PLBCG +1 mg Alum (Alhydrogel, Sigma), 2 doses were administered with an interval of 3-weeks], and BCG+PLBCG-Al (106 CFU of BCG and 3 weeks later 50 μg PLBCG-AL). Two months after the last inoculation, mice were challenged with 2.5 × 105 CFU of H37Rv Mtb strain in 100 μL of PBS by the intratracheal route as previously described.Citation18,19 All animals were euthanized 2 months after Mtb infection under anesthesia with pentobarbital.Citation18,19 All procedures were performed in a class III cabinet in a biosafety level III facility according to the guidelines Citation20 and approved by the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee of the National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition “Salvador Zubirán” (INCMNSZ) of Mexico.

Bacilli load

The bacilli load was determined by CFU of Mtb in lung homogenates. Four lungs per group were disrupted separately in a Polytron homogenizer (Brinkmann Instruments, Rexleid, Canada) in 1 ml of isotonic salt solution containing 0.05% Tween 80 (Sigma), and 100 μL of this homogenate in fold10- serial dilutions were plated on Petri dishes containing Bacto Middlebrook 7H10 agar (Difco, USA) and incubated at 37°C. Colonies were counted twice under a stereoscopic microscope after 14 d of incubation.

Histopathology and morphometric studies

The right lung of 3 mice per group was perfused via the trachea with 100% ethanol and processed for histological studies. Sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin.Citation19 The pneumonic areas were measured and analyzed using Leica Q-win system software (Leica Microsystems Imaging Solutions LTD, Cambridge, UK, 25x).

Data management

Measurements were made blind, and data of log 10CFU and percentage of pneumonic area/lung are expressed as the mean ± SD. One way ANOVA and Multiple Range test were used for the determination of significant differences.

Results and discussion

Mtb cell wall components have been suggested to contain virulence factors and protective antigens.Citation6-9,21 Taking into consideration the high antigenic and genetic homology between Mtb and BCGCitation13-15 and our previous results eliciting cross reactive immune responses after the immunization with PLBCG-Al,Citation16 it is reasonable to assume that PLBCG-Al can be a potential vaccine candidate against TB.

In this paper we evaluated the protective effect of PLBCG-Al in a mouse model of intratracheal infection and its potential to be used as a booster to BCG vaccination. The protective effect was measured by determining the bacterial load and the tissue damage (percentage of pneumonic area) in the lungs of immunized mice compared to PBS group and with animals receiving BCG.

Taking into consideration that the evaluation of protection was carried out 2 months after challenge and the fact that the mortality in the model used appears between 2 and 4 months post-challenge, the study of survival was not included in this experiment.

As shown in , PLBCG-Al and BCG+PLBCG-Al groups were capable of significantly reducing the bacterial load in the lungs in comparison with non-treated animals (p < 0.001). While PLBCG-Al immunized animals showed similar levels of CFU reduction as those of the BCG group, mice immunized with PLBCG-Al as a booster to BCG (BCG+PLBCG-Al) displayed significantly lesser CFU compared to BCG-vaccinated animals (p < 0.001).

Figure 1. Determination of bacterial load in lungs of mice challenged with Mtb. Mice were challenged by intratracheal route 2 months after inoculation. Groups: PBS, BCG (106 CFU of BCG, one inoculation), PLBCG-Al [50 μg PLBCG +1 mg Alum (Alhydrogel, Sigma), 2 doses administered in a 3-week interval], and BCG+PLBCG-Al (106 CFU of BCG and 3 weeks later 50μg PLBCG-AL). The statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Multiple Range test. Each bar represents the mean ± SD. Different letters denotes significant statistical difference between the groups. P < 0.001. (n=4 per group)

Figure 1. Determination of bacterial load in lungs of mice challenged with Mtb. Mice were challenged by intratracheal route 2 months after inoculation. Groups: PBS, BCG (106 CFU of BCG, one inoculation), PLBCG-Al [50 μg PLBCG +1 mg Alum (Alhydrogel, Sigma), 2 doses administered in a 3-week interval], and BCG+PLBCG-Al (106 CFU of BCG and 3 weeks later 50μg PLBCG-AL). The statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Multiple Range test. Each bar represents the mean ± SD. Different letters denotes significant statistical difference between the groups. P < 0.001. (n=4 per group)

Regarding the lung surface area affected by pneumonia, as shown in , mice immunized with BCG, PLBCG-Al and BCG+PLBCG-Al showed significantly fewer percentage of lung pneumonic area than animals receiving PBS (p < 0.001). In contrast with the results obtained with the bacterial loads in lungs there are no statistical differences between the groups receiving PLBCG-Al as a booster of BCG compared with animal receiving PLBCG-Al or BCG respectively.

Figure 2. Determination of pneumonic area in lungs of mice challenged with Mtb. Mice were challenged by intratracheal route 2 months after inoculation. Groups: PBS, BCG (106 CFU of BCG, one inoculation), PLBCG-Al [50 μg PLBCG +1 mg Alum (Alhydrogel, Sigma), 2 doses were administered in a 3-week interval], and BCG+PLBCG-Al (106 CFU of BCG and 3 weeks later 50μg PLBCG-Al). Morphometric study was carried out with light microscopy using Leica Q-win System Software. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Multiple Range test. Each bar represents the mean ± SD. Different letters denotes significant statistical difference between the groups. p < 0.001. (n = 3 per group).

Figure 2. Determination of pneumonic area in lungs of mice challenged with Mtb. Mice were challenged by intratracheal route 2 months after inoculation. Groups: PBS, BCG (106 CFU of BCG, one inoculation), PLBCG-Al [50 μg PLBCG +1 mg Alum (Alhydrogel, Sigma), 2 doses were administered in a 3-week interval], and BCG+PLBCG-Al (106 CFU of BCG and 3 weeks later 50μg PLBCG-Al). Morphometric study was carried out with light microscopy using Leica Q-win System Software. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Multiple Range test. Each bar represents the mean ± SD. Different letters denotes significant statistical difference between the groups. p < 0.001. (n = 3 per group).

In general there was correspondence between CFU and lung surface area affected by pneumonia.

Similar results were obtained of bacterial load and pneumonic area in another experiment using animals immunized with BCG Phipps strain as a control group (data not shown).

The protection conferred by BCG could last for up to 20 yCitation1-5,22-30 The peak of incidence of TB increases progressively up to adulthood probably related with the lost of protection provided by BCG vaccination.Citation31

Ethical issues related with the possibility to use control groups without BCG vaccination in clinical trials may difficult the evaluation of vaccines aimed to replace BCG, which is an intervention preventing at least the mortality and sequelae associated with the severe forms of TB in childhood.Citation31 Therefore it would be more acceptable that the first generation of new TB vaccines be based on candidates to be administered as boosters to the primary BCG vaccination. In this way the advantages of BCG vaccination are retained (protection against severe forms of the disease in childhood and efficacy window of 10-20 y for pulmonary TB as well as for leprosy) while re-enforcing protection with a heterologous vaccine to boost the initial protection afforded by BCG.Citation31 This concept is reflected in the current clinical trials where most of the candidates are evaluated as boosters to primary BCG vaccination.Citation31

Despite of this, vaccine candidates aimed at replacing BCG as recombinant BCG strain VPM 1002, and live attenuated Mtb strain MTBVAC are in different phases of clinical evaluation.Citation32 Many other candidates with potential to replace BCG are in preclinical evaluation.Citation32

A variety of subunit and live vaccines have been developed as booster vaccines.Citation31,32 Once successful results are obtained with them used alone, they are tested as booster of BCG. Therefore, it is notable that our formulation adjuvated with alum showed levels of protection comparable to that detected in BCG and can exceed BCG regarding bacterial loads in lungs when used as a booster to BCG.

Priming with BCG and booster with recombinant Ag85B induced superior protection against Mtb than BCG in guinea pigs.Citation33 In the same study, immunization with recombinant BCG over-expressing Ag85B gave superior protection than BCG; however, not further protection was obtained after booster with recombinant Ag85B in these animals.Citation33

An Ag85A DNA vaccine used as booster to BCG did not enhance protection compared with BCG.Citation34 However, the DNA vaccine used as prime immunization followed by BCG booster improves the protection.Citation34

Adenovirus-vectored vaccine expressing Ag85A (AdAg85A), used as intranasal booster, increased the protection conferred by BCG.Citation35

In another study, recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara expressing antigen 85A (MVA85A) have shown to be highly immunogenic in humans.Citation36 However, although the BCG prime-MVA85A boosting regimen has successfully completed Phase I clinical trials, in Phase II b clinical trials in South Africa has failed to show significant protection against TB and Mtb infection.Citation36,37 However, this vaccine candidate could be protective in adolescents and adults which have a well-developed immune response and could be protective in all age groups against severe disease.Citation37

Proteoliposomes of Mycobacterium smegmatis elicited humoral immune responses against mycobacterial lipids in mice, demonstrating the presence of lipid components in mycobacterial proteoliposomes.Citation17

Lipds are important potential targets for vaccine development against TB considering the importance of these components in the virulence of Mtb.Citation37,39

Several vaccine candidates containing mycobacterial lipids have demonstrated protective capacity in guinea pigs and miceCitation40-43

The current study suggests that PLBCG-Al as a booster to BCG could be a new alternative candidate to be tested for protection against TB in further phases of evaluation.

One advantage of this strategy is that it not rely only on the booster with one or few antigens, but instead, it uses a candidate containing a variety of antigens, mainly associated with the cell wall, which boost a wide array of responses, probably both cellular and humoral, to promote a good overall level of protection. Another potential advantage is the possibility to be used in HIV-positive infants currently not receiving BCG vaccination due to the risk of disseminated BCG infection and mortalityCitation44

Conclusions

Our results demonstrated, for the first time, the protective effect of PL obtained from BCG adjuvanted with alum (PLBCG-Al) in a mouse model of intratracheal infection with Mtb. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that this PLBCG-Al could be used as a potential booster to BCG. The prime-boost vaccination with BCG+PLBCG-Al provided even greater protection than BCG alone. Therefore, the BCG+PLBCG-Al combination could be a potential vaccine strategy against TB which deserves further studies to evaluate its feasibility and efficacy.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Dr. Reynaldo Acevedo for his kind cooperation in this work.

Funding

Funding was provided under the Long-term Research Grant Scheme (203/PSK/6722001), Ministry of Education, Malaysia, the Ministry of Science and Technology, Cuba, and the Institute of Science and Technology of Mexico city (PICSA12-173). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • Falzon D, Raviglione M. TB control: achievements, obstacles and the role of vaccines. In: Norazmi MN, Acosta A, Sarmiento ME, eds. The Art &Science of tuberculosis vaccine development. 2nd ed. Malaysia. Oxford University Press. p.13-29. ISBN 978 983 47 0355 4 (http://tbvaccines.usm.my/finlay/) (2014)
  • Zumla A, Raviglione M, Hafner R, von Reyn CF. Tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 2013;368(8):745-55; PMID:23425167; http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1200894
  • Zumla A, George A, Sharma V, Herbert N, Baroness Masham of Ilton. WHO's 2013 global report on tuberculosis: successes, threats, and opportunities. Lancet 2013;382(9907):1765-7; PMID:24269294; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62078-4
  • Kaufmann SHE, Lange C, Rao M, Balaji KN, Lotze M, Schito M, Zumla AL, Maeurer M. Progress in tuberculosis vaccine development and host-directed therapies—a state of the art review. Lancet Respir Med 2014;2(4):301-20; PMID:24717627; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70033-5
  • McShane H: Tuberculosis vaccines: beyond bacilli Calmette-Guérin. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2011;366:2782-9; PMID:21893541; http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0097
  • Smith I: Mycobacterium tuberculosis pathogenesis and molecular determinants of virulence. Clin Microbiol Rev 2003;16(3):463-96; PMID:12857778; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.16.3.463-496.2003
  • Morandi M, Sali M, Manganelli R, Delogu G. Exploiting the mycobacterial cell wall to design improved vaccines against tuberculosis. J Infect Dev Ctries 2013;7(3):169-81; PMID:23492994; http://dx.doi.org/10.3855/jidc.3114
  • Lopez-Marin LM. Nonprotein structures from mycobacteria: emerging actors for tuberculosis control. Clin Dev Immunol 2012;2012:917860; PMID:22611423; http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/917860
  • Kasmar AG, Layre E, Moody B. Lipid adjuvants and antigens embedded in the mycobacterial cell envelope. In: Norazmi MN, Acosta A, Sarmiento ME, eds. The Art &Science of tuberculosis vaccine development. 2nd ed. Malaysia. Oxford University Press. p. 123-149. ISBN 978 983 47 0355 4 (http://tbvaccines.usm.my/finlay/) (2014)
  • Pérez JL, Acevedo R, Callicó A, Fernández Y, Cedré B, Año G, Gonzalez L, Falero G, Talavera A, Perez O, et al: A proteoliposome based formulation administered by the nasal route produces vibriocidal antibodies against El Tor Ogawa Vibrio cholerae O1 in BALB/c mice. Vaccine 2009;27(2):205-12; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.10.052
  • Sotolongo F, Campa C, Casanueva V, Fajardo EM, Cuevas IE, González N: Cuban Meningococcal BC Vaccine: experiences and contributions from 20 years of application. MEDICC Rev 2008;9(1):16-22; PMID:21483377
  • Pérez O, Bracho G, Lastre M, Mora N, del Campo J, Gil D, Zayas C, Acevedo R, Gonzales D, Lopez JA, et al: Novel adjuvant based on a proteoliposome-derived cochleate structure containing native lipopolysaccharide as a pathogen-associated molecular pattern. Immunol Cell Biol 2004;82(6):603-10; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1711.2004.01293.x
  • Garnier T, Eiglmeier K, Camus JC, Medina N, Mansoor H, Pryor M, Duthoy S, Grondin S, Lacroix C, Monsempe C, et al: The complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium bovis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100(13):7877-82; PMID:12788972; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1130426100
  • Zhang W, Zhang Y, Zheng H, Pan Y, Liu H, Du P, Wan L, Liu J, Zhu B, Zhao G, Chen C, Wan K. Genome sequencing and analysis of BCG vaccine strains. PLoS One 2013;8(8):e71243; PMID:23977002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071243
  • Gomes LH, Otto TD, Vasconcellos EA, Ferrão PM, Maia RM, Moreira AS, Ferreira MA, Castello-Branco LR, Degrave WM, Mendonça-Lima L. Genome sequence of Mycobacterium bovis BCG Moreau, the Brazilian vaccine strain against tuberculosis. J Bacteriol 2011;193(19):5600-1; PMID:21914899; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.05827-11
  • Reyes F, Tirado Y, Puig A, Borrero R, Reyes G, Fernández S, Pérez J L, Kadir R, Zayas C, Norazmi MN, et al: Immunogenicity and cross-reactivity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis of proteoliposomes derived from Mycobacterium bovis BCG. BMC Immunol 2013;14(Suppl 1):S7; PMID:23458692
  • Rodriguez L, Tirado Y, Reyes F, Puig A, Kadir R, Borrero R, Fernandez S, Reyes G, Alvarez N, Garcia MA, et al: Proteoliposomes from Mycobacterium smegmatis induce immune cross-reactivity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens in mice. Vaccine 2011; 29(37):6236-41; PMID:21736914; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.06.077
  • Cervantes-Villagrana A, Hernández-Pando R, Biragyn A, Castañeda-Delgado J, Bodgain M, Martínez-Fierro M, Sada E, Trujillo V, Enciso-Moreno A, Rivas-Santiago B. Prime-boost BCG vaccination with DNA vaccines based in β-defensin-2 and mycobacterial antigens ESAT6 or Ag85B improve protection in a tuberculosis experimental model. Vaccine 2013; 31: 676-84; PMID:23196205; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.042
  • Hernández Pando R, Aguilar D, Orozco H, Serrano A, Ahlem C, Trauger R, Schramm B, Reading C, Frincke J, Rook G: 16alpha-Bromoepiandrosterone restores T helper cell type 1 activity and accelerates chemotherapy-induced bacterial clearance in a model of progressive pulmonary tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 2005;191(2):299-306; http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/426453
  • Canadian Council On Animal Care: Guide to the care and use of experimental animals. Ottawa, Ont; 1984; 1(2).
  • Jeon BY, Kim HJ, Kim SC, Jo EK, Park JK, Paik TH, Kim SJ, Cho SN. Protection of mice against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection by immunization with aqueous fraction of Triton X-100-soluble cell wall proteins. Scand J Immunol 2008;67(1):18-23; PMID:18021187
  • Doherty TM, Andersen P: Vaccines for tuberculosis: novel concepts and recent progress. Clin Microbiol Rev 2005;18(4):687-702; PMID:16223953; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.18.4.687-702.2005
  • Young DB, Perkins MD, Duncan K, Barry CE 3rd. Confronting the scientific obstacles to global control of tuberculosis. J Clin Invest 2008;118(4):1255-65; PMID:18382738; http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI34614
  • Dye C. Tuberculosis 2000-2010: control, but not elimination. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2000;4(12 Suppl 2):S146-52; PMID:11144545
  • al-Kassimi FA, al-Hajjaj MS, al-Orainey IO, Bamgboye EA. Does the protective effect of neonatal BCG correlate with vaccine-induced tuberculin reaction? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152(5 Pt 1):1575-8; PMID:7582297; http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.152.5.7582297
  • Colditz GA, Berkey CS, Mosteller F, Brewer TF, Wilson ME, Burdick E, Fineberg HV. The efficacy of bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination of newborns and infants in the prevention of tuberculosis: meta-analyses of the published literature. Pediatrics 1995;96(1 Pt 1):29-35; PMID:7596718
  • Lanckriet C, Lévy-Bruhl D, Bingono E, Siopathis RM, Guérin N. Efficacy of BCG vaccination of the newborn: evaluation by a follow-up study of contacts in Bangui. Int J Epidemiol 1995;24(5):1042-9; PMID:8557438; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/24.5.1042
  • Colditz GA, Brewer TF, Berkey CS, Wilson ME, Burdick E, Fineberg HV, Mosteller F. Efficacy of BCG vaccine in the prevention of tuberculosis. Meta-analysis of the published literature. JAMA 1994;271(9):698-702; PMID:8309034; http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03510330076038
  • Fine PE. Variation in protection by BCG: implications of and for heterologous immunity. Lancet 1995;346(8986):1339-45; PMID:7475776; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92348-9
  • Brewer TF. Preventing tuberculosis with bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccine: a meta-analysis of the literature. Clin Infect Dis 2000;31(Suppl 3):S64-7; PMID:11010824; http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/314072
  • Dietrich J, Doherty TM. Subunit Vaccines against infection with MTB; preclinical and clinical considerations. In: Norazmi MN, Acosta A, Sarmiento ME, eds. The Art &Science of tuberculosis vaccine development. 2nd ed. Malaysia. Oxford University Press. p. 693-737. ISBN 978 983 47 0355 4 (http://tbvaccines.usm.my/finlay/) (2014)
  • Brennan MJ, Sweeney AR, Woolley J, Clagett B, Barker LF. New TB vaccines. What is the pipeline? In: Norazmi MN, Acosta A, Sarmiento ME, eds. The Art &Science of tuberculosis vaccine development. 2nd ed. Malaysia. Oxford University Press. p. 949-981. ISBN 978 983 47 0355 4 (http://tbvaccines.usm.my/finlay/) (2014)
  • Horwitz MA, Harth G, Dillon BJ, Maslesa-Galic S: Enhancing the protective efficacy of Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccination against tuberculosis by boosting with the Mycobacterium tuberculosis major secretory protein. Infect Immun 2005;73(8): 4676-83; PMID:16040980; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.73.8.4676-4683.2005
  • Romano M, D'Souza S, Adnet PY, Laali R, Jurion F, Palflied K, Huygen K: Priming but not boosting with plasmid DNA encoding mycolyl-transferase Ag85A from Mycobacterium tuberculosis increases the survival time of Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccinated mice against low dose intravenous challenge with M. tuberculosis H37Rv. Vaccine 2006;24(16): 3353-64; PMID:16488518; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.12.066
  • Santosuosso M, McCormick S, Zhang X, Zganiacz A, Xing Z: Intranasal boosting with an adenovirus-vectored vaccine markedly enhances protection by parenteral Mycobacterium bovis BCG immunization against pulmonary tuberculosis. Infect Immun 2006;74(8):4634-43; PMID:16861651; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00517-06
  • Pathan AA, Sander CR, Fletcher HA, Poulton I, Alder NC, Beveridge NE, Whelan KT, Hill AV, McShane H: Boosting BCG with recombinant modified vaccinia Ankara expressing antigen 85A: different boosting intervals and implications for efficacy trials. PLoS ONE 2007;2(10): e1052; PMID:17957238; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001052
  • Tameris MD, Hatherill M, Landry BS, Scriba TJ, Snowden MA, Lockhart S, Shea JE, McClain JB, Hussey GD, Hanekon WA, et al; MVA85A020 Trial Study Team. Safety and efficacy of MVA85A, a new tuberculosis vaccine, in infants previously vaccinated with BCG: a randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet 2013;381(9871):1021-8; PMID:23391465; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60177-4
  • Morandi M, Sali M, Manganelli R, Delogu G. Exploiting the mycobacterial cell wall to design improved vaccines against tuberculosis. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2013;7(3):169-81; PMID:23492994; http://dx.doi.org/10.3855/jidc.3114
  • Lopez-Marin LM. Non protein structures from mycobacteria: emerging actors for tuberculosis control. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:917860; PMID:22611423; http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/917860
  • Dascher C, Hiromatsu K, Xiong X, Morehouse C, Watts G, Llu G, McMurray D, LeClair K, Porcelli S, Brenner M: Immunization with a mycobacterial lipid vaccine improves pulmonary pathology in the guinea pig model of tuberculosis. Int. Immunol. 2003;15(8):915-25; PMID:12882829; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intimm/dxg091
  • Singh AP, Khuller GK. Liposomes as a carrier for mannophosphoinositide antigens of mycobacteria. Indian J Biochem Biophys. 1993;30(3):160-5; PMID:8406546
  • Singh AP, Khuller GK. Induction of immunity against experimental tuberculosis with mycobacterial mannophosphoinositides encapsulated in liposomes containing lipid A. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 1994;8(2):119-26; PMID:8173551; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.1994.tb00433.x
  • García MA, Borrero R, Lanio ME, Tirado Y, Alvarez N, Puig A, Aguilar A, Canet L, Mata Espinoza D, Barrios Payán J, et al. Protective effect of a lipid-based preparation from Mycobacterium smegmatis in a murine model of progressive pulmonary tuberculosis. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014:273129.
  • WHO. Revised BCG vaccination guidelines for infants at risk for HIV infection. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2007;82(21):193-6; PMID:17526121