Predicted long-term antibody persistence for a tick-borne encephalitis vaccine: results from a modeling study beyond 10 years after a booster dose following different primary vaccination schedules

ABSTRACT

In tick-borne encephalitis (TBE)-endemic regions, long-term vaccination programs are efficient in preventing the disease. A booster dose of a polygeline-free inactivated TBE vaccine (Encepur Adults, GSK), administered approximately 3 years post-primary vaccination according to 1 of 3 licensed vaccination schedules in adults and adolescents, resulted in antibody persistence for 10 years post-boosting. We used different power-law models (PLMs) to predict long-term persistence of anti-TBE virus neutralization test (NT) antibody titers over a period of 20 years post-booster dose, based on individual antibody NT titers measured for 10 years post-booster vaccination. The PLMs were fitted on pooled data for all vaccine schedules. A mean NT titer of 261 (95% prediction interval: 22–3096), considerably above the accepted threshold of protection (NT titers ≥10), was predicted 20 years post-booster vaccination with TBE vaccine. Our modeled data suggest that the intervals of booster doses could be increased without compromising protection against TBE.

KEYWORDS:

• Tick-borne encephalitis
• polygeline-free inactivated TBE vaccine
• antibody persistence
• statistical model
• power-law model

Introduction

Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE), an infectious disease of the central nervous system, is caused by the TBE virus (TBEV) of the Flavivirus genus, transmitted mainly through Ixodes ticks. In the European Union, TBE is notifiable since 2012; notification rates were the same in 2014 and 2015 (0.4/100,000 population),¹ although emerging data from 2016 illustrate an increase in the number of cases for eight countries.²

The non-specificity of clinical symptoms in the initial viremic phase and the lack of effective treatment make TBE very difficult to manage. This can lead to long-term sequelae in more than 30% of cases.³ Case-fatality rates differ according to the TBEV subtype, but can reach up to 40% for the Far-Eastern subtype, while being significantly lower for the Siberian (6–8%), and European (≤1.4%) variation.^3,4 Several vaccines, based on different strains of TBEV, are available and considered effective in preventing TBE.⁴

The polygeline-free inactivated TBE vaccine (Encepur Adults, GSK), targeting the European subtype, is licensed in Europe for use in adults and adolescents ≥12 years of age and has been shown to be immunogenic and well tolerated,^5,6 with persistently high antibody titers induced up to 10 years following a first booster vaccination.^7,8 The TBE vaccine has also been reported to induce antibodies against various Asian TBEV isolates.^4,9

Although there is no established correlate of protection against TBE, the World Health Organization supports the use of a surrogate marker of protection represented by the presence of circulating antibodies against TBEV at or above a locally agreed concentration considered as clinically meaningful.^4,5 In clinical studies conducted with the currently licensed polygeline-free formulation, antibody response elicited by the TBE vaccine was measured by a validated in-house neutralization test (NT), for which anti-TBEV NT titers ≥2 and ≥10 were chosen as thresholds indicative of seropositivity and of a clinically meaningful antibody response, respectively.^10,11

The World Health Organization recommends vaccination against TBE for individuals of all ages living in highly endemic areas and to targeted cohorts (>50–60-year-olds) in low-to-moderate-endemic regions, as well as to travelers planning outdoor activities in TBE-endemic areas.⁴ Several TBE-endemic European countries recommend routine vaccination as a three-dose primary series according to one out of three different approved schedules, followed by repeated booster doses.¹² However, the optimal intervals for booster vaccination necessary to ensure long-term protection against TBE are still being debated, as only a few studies reported on long-term immunogenicity of available vaccines.^8,13 A recent study demonstrated that ≥90% of individuals vaccinated with the TBE vaccine maintained NT titers ≥10 up to 10 years after a first booster dose, regardless of age and primary vaccination schedule received.⁸ Moreover, no TBE infections occurred during this period.⁸

With the aim of estimating the evolution of the immune response over time beyond available clinical data, we modeled anti-TBEV NT antibody levels up to 20 years post-first boosting following primary vaccination with one of the 3 licensed schedules.¹¹ We used several power-law models (PLMs), based on antibody levels measured in two extension studies in participants followed 5⁷ and 10 years⁸ post-booster dose to predict the development of antibody levels beyond the time period covered by clinical trials.

A summary contextualizing the results, the potential clinical research relevance and the impact of our study is displayed in Figure 1, for the benefit of health-care practitioners.

Figure 1. Focus on the patient section.

Methods

In the primary study, a randomized trial conducted in Czechia, adolescents and adults ≥12 years old received three primary doses of the TBE vaccine (Encepur) according to a licensed (rapid, conventional or accelerated conventional) or an unlicensed (modified conventional) vaccination schedule.¹¹ In the first extension study (NCT00387634), 283 participants received a booster dose at study entry, 3 years post-primary vaccination. Additionally, 40 participants who had received a booster dose 12–18 months post-primary were enrolled; all were followed up for 5 years.⁷ Of these, 201 individuals who had received one of the licensed vaccination schedules were followed up in the second extension study (NCT01562444) from year 6 to 10 post-booster dose.⁸

The current analysis was conducted using individual anti-TBEV NT titers of adolescents and adults vaccinated with one of the three prime-boost vaccination schedules, measured once a year, for up to 10 years following the booster dose. All available data from participants in each of the primary and extension studies were used. The assay used for the evaluation of NT titers was previously described.¹⁴ The use of the data from the previously collected samples was covered by approval from the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Hradec Králové.

We used several different PLMs to model the data. The PLM has previously been employed to predict long-term antibody persistence post-vaccination against the human papillomavirus.^15,16 Briefly, the model accounts for an exponential rate of B-cell decay to estimate the persistence of antibody levels over time, following vaccination.

A more sophisticated adaptation of the PLM is the piecewise PLM (PPLM). The PPLM combines multiple PL functions, each fitted to different, consecutive intervals of data, which allows for more flexible estimation of the evolution of antibody levels over the entire period of time. The monotone PPLM (MPPLM) further restrained these functions from increasing in value to exclude a potentially biologically not meaningful increase in antibody level over time. Finally, we considered the extended PLM (EPLM) proposed by Fraser et al. This model is an extension of the PLM which accounts for two populations of B-cells involved in a long-term antibody plateau: activated and memory B-cells.¹⁶

The models were compared using the classic model selection based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC). Moreover, models were compared based on prediction error. To that end, a separate calculation was done in which the two last years of measured data were not considered. A sensitivity analysis excluding outliers was also performed, with outliers identified by the standard interquartile range rule (1.5 × IQR).

The values predicted by the models were then compared with the measured values. All predicted values were reported as geometric means.

All statistical analyses were performed using the PROC NLMIXED subroutine in Statistical Analysis Systems (SAS). Formulas, SAS syntax, and estimated parameters for each model are provided in the Supplementary Material.

Results

For all three primary vaccination schedules (rapid, conventional and accelerated conventional), a similar yearly distribution of anti-TBEV antibody mean NT titers was observed following the booster dose (Figure 2). Only 14 outliers were identified throughout the 10-year follow-up (Supplementary Figure 1).

Figure 2. Distribution of measured anti-TBEV antibody NT titers over 15 years post-first dose of the TBE vaccine, administered according to the rapid (a), conventional (b), accelerated conventional (c) primary schedules and pooled data (d).

Legend: TBEV, tick-borne encephalitis virus; NT, neutralization test; TBE vaccine, polygeline-free inactivated TBE vaccine.

Note: All available serological data from the three trials (primary study, NCT00387634, and NCT01562444) were included, regardless of the participants’ follow-up status in the subsequent study extensions.

* Data for year 4 since the first vaccine dose correspond to 21 days post-booster dose, administered 3 years post-primary vaccination (conventional and accelerated conventional schedule) or 1.5–2 years post-booster dose, administered at 12–18 months post-primary vaccination (rapid schedule). Nine of the 49 individuals receiving the rapid schedule were administered the booster dose at 3 years post-primary vaccination, causing the artificial peak in NT titers at year 4, but these data were compensated for in the modeling.

When the PLM was adjusted to account for the vaccination schedule using post-booster data only, the effect of the primary schedule was found to be statistically non-significant (p-value = 0.11). Therefore, all models were applied on pooled data from participants receiving any of the three vaccination schedules and considering the timing of the booster dose (i.e., year 3 post-first primary dose for the majority of participants) as the starting time point for the prediction (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Mean anti-TBEV antibody NT levels over 20 years post-booster dose, as predicted by the different models (a) and prediction intervals for PPLM and MPPL (b).

Legend: TBEV, tick-borne encephalitis virus; NT, neutralization test; PLM, power-law model; AIC, Akaike information criterion; PPLM, piecewise PLM; MPPLM, monotone PPLM; EPLM, extended PLM.

Note: Curves indicate the observed and predicted mean NT titer (panel A) and predicted mean NT titer with upper and lower limits of the 95% prediction interval (panel B). The dotted gray line (panel B) indicates the threshold considered as indicative of protection against TBE (NT titer of 10).

All models showed an initial decline until year 1 post-booster dose, with values stabilizing after this timepoint. The PLM-predicted a mean anti-TBEV antibody NT titer decline from 386 at year 1 post-booster dose to 197 at year 20 post-booster dose (Figure 3). The PPLM showed a slight increase after the initial drop, predicting a titer of 349 at year 20 post boosting. The MPPL predicted the most stable antibody levels, with a titer of 261 at year 20 post booster; the same value was predicted by the EPLM. The modeled prediction intervals show that >95% of patients are predicted to have antibody NT titer levels >10 within a timeframe of 20 years post-booster dose (Table 1).

Table 1. Mean anti-TBEV antibody NT titers at 20 years post-booster vaccination as predicted by power law models.

Model	Mean NT titer	95% prediction interval
PLM	197.60	13.17–2964.23
PPL	349.83	29.31–4175.42
MPPL	261.49	22.08–3096.31
EPL	261.17	22.05 3092.98

TBEV, tick-borne encephalitis virus; NT, neutralization test; PLM, power law model; PPLM, piecewise PLM; MPPLM, monotone PPLM; EPLM, extended PLM.

According to the AIC the model providing the best fit is the PPLM. This was supported by the evaluation of the prediction error.

The sensitivity analysis showed that the outliers had no impact on the results of the pooled data modeling (data not shown).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study modeling long-term antibody persistence after vaccination against TBE, providing modeled data beyond the 10 years post-first booster period investigated to date. Twenty years post-booster vaccination with the TBE vaccine, different models predict a mean NT titer considerably above the established threshold of 10 for more than 95% of individuals who were included in these analyses. Therefore, sufficient protection against TBE is predicted for at least 20 years after booster vaccination with the TBE vaccine, when any of the licensed primary three-dose schedules is completed and a booster dose is administered at 1 or 3 years post-primary vaccination, depending on the primary schedule.

When considering the follow-up of adolescents and adults who received the full primary vaccination series and a booster dose, no consistent decline in antibody NT titers was measured over a period of 10 years. For instance, at 5 years post-booster dose, the observed geometric mean titers ranged between 300 and 429 across groups,⁷ while at 10 years post-booster, they were 166–245 in the total-vaccinated cohort and 260–307 in the per-protocol set.⁸ Of note, over 10 years of follow-up post-boosting, no consistent decline in geometric mean NT titers was observed within the same age groups, although smaller overall values were observed for participants receiving the booster dose at 50–59 and ≥60 years of age than at 15–49 years of age.⁸ However, the comparison was hindered by a relatively small sample size for the ≥60-year age group, which also applied for our analysis. Therefore, analyses were not performed by age stratum.

According to the AIC, the best model for the provided data was the PPLM, which predicted an increase of antibody levels over the timeframe considered. This increase simulates the slight increase in antibodies observed in the measured data obtained during the trials. One possibility is that exposure to or vaccination against other flaviviruses (such as yellow fever, dengue or Japanese encephalitis) could result in antibody formation with a certain cross-reactivity within the assay; although this is unlikely for NT, which was shown to distinguish between pathogens belonging to the TBEV family.¹⁷ An exposure to TBEV itself appears unlikely, since in the case of infection a more sustained increase in antibody levels would be expected. However, the predicted values as well as the prediction interval indicate that participants not showing elevated results due to potential cross-reactivity or high baseline levels would still have NT titers consistently above threshold levels after 20 years post-boosting.

Our modeled data suggest that the interval between booster doses currently recommended for immunization against TBE (every 3–5 years)¹² may be increased without compromising the expected protection, thus potentially lowering associated costs from both the societal and patient perspective. However, this remains to be confirmed by further empirical evidence and results from future studies following up vaccinated individuals will provide data against which the predicted rate of antibody titer decline could potentially be validated. Evaluation up to 15 years post-booster dose is currently ongoing as part of a third extension study (NCT03294135).

While generally, results of a statistical analysis may vary depending on the model used, a strength of this analysis is the use of several different models leading to similar results demonstrating the robustness of the prediction. However, the analysis has also several potential limitations. Among those, one of the most important is the assumption about the dynamics and decline of B- and T-cells, as the statistical analysis cannot be the sole driver for the conclusions. Another potential limitation is the fact that a drop in NT titers was not predicted by any of the models, as the observed data used as basis for this modeling exercise showed a steady trend beyond one year post-booster dose, without reaching the turning point where antibodies started to fall, which made it impossible to estimate the antibody half-life. Due to the relatively small sample size for the older age range, in particular, the ≥60-year age group, the analyses were not carried out by age strata; potential extrapolation of results from the pooled age groups to individuals ≥60 years of age should therefore be interpreted with caution. Moreover, these results are specific to the TBE vaccine used, and cannot be generalized to other vaccines.

In conclusion, the predicted antibody persistence was considerably above the surrogate marker of protection (NT titers ≥10) up to 20 years post-booster vaccination with the TBE vaccine. Our results suggest that booster schedules could be increased in the future, although our modeled estimates still need to be confirmed by field data.

Abbreviations

AIC	=	Akaike information criterion
CI	=	Confidence interval
IQR	=	Interquartile range
NT	=	Neutralization test
PLM	=	Power-law model
TBE	=	Tick-borne encephalitis
TBEV	=	Tick-borne encephalitis virus;
TBE vaccine	=	Polygeline-free inactivated TBE vaccine

Author contribution

MC, JB, AC, VB, and IG were involved in the conception and design of the study. MC performed the study. MC, JB, AC, VB, and IG were involved in the analysis and interpretation of the data. All authors have critically reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Data sharing statement

This product has been transferred to Bavarian Nordic. Hence data of this study will not be posted on CSDR (ClinicalStudyDataRequest.com) as Bavarian Nordic has not been a member of this consortium.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

MC, AC, VB, and IG are employees of the GSK group of companies. VB owns restricted shares of the GSK group of companies. JB reports grants from Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics during the conduct of the study.

Trademark statement

Encepur Adults is a trademark owned by the GSK group of companies.

Acknowledgments

Publication management and medical writing support were provided by Michaela Conrad and Petronela M. Petrar (Modis c/o GSK).

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s website at https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2019.1700712.

Correction Statement

This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Additional information

Funding

GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA supported this work, was involved in all stages of the study conduct and analysis, and took charge of all costs associated with the development and publishing of this manuscript.