https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4572-8794
ABSTRACT
Over the past few years, many innovative vaccines became available that offer protection for diseases which have never been prevented before. While there are several factors that could have an impact on access, the use of health technology assessment (HTA) undoubtedly is also one of the contributing factors. Objectives: To explore the landscape of vaccine access and the role of HTA in new vaccine adoption in Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries. Results: A great deal of progress has been made in terms of access to new and innovation vaccine in the region. Variation in access to these vaccines comparing between countries, however, is still observed. The use of HTA in supporting new vaccine adoption is still in an early stage especially in Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance-eligible countries. Conclusions: Improving the use of HTA evidences to support decision making could accelerate the efficient adoption of new vaccine in ASEAN region.
Introduction
Vaccines are one of the most cost-effective health interventions. With numerous efforts made to improve access to vaccine and immunization program, for example, the implementation of World Health Organization (WHO) Expanded Program in Immunization (EPI), the establishment of the Gavi and the Immunization Agenda 2030 (IA2030),1 situation of access to vaccines and immunization services around the globe has shown a promising progress. With the advance in biotechnology, more innovative vaccines, which are new vaccines that involve the use of new antigen to protect the diseases that could not be prevented before, for example, dengue vaccine, and the combination of previously used vaccines into a new product become available.Citation2 These innovations aim at better and broader protection of human against disease as well as increasing compliance and coverage for vaccines.
Health technology assessment (HTA) is a form of policy research which systematically integrates evidence-based studies from multidisciplinary fields.Citation3 The aim of HTA is to provide useful evidence on the optimal use of limited health resources and ensures effective, efficient, and equitable access to technologies in those countries.Citation4 HTA plays a crucial role in decision making for vaccine introduction in the country. Since universal health coverage (UHC) policies need sufficient evidence for policy making, HTA can facilitate the process to weigh different criteria such as population effects of vaccine to disease, and budget to guide decision makers on adopting new vaccines especially in the low- and middle-income country (LMICs).Citation5
Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is the region home to ten countries including Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Myanmar, Brunei, Philippines, and Indonesia. The income level in the region is very diverse from high-income countries (HICs) like Singapore and Brunei to low-income countries (LICs) like Myanmar and Laos.Citation6 Also geographical and population sizes differ one of the most populous regions in the world which poses challenges. The disease pattern in this region is, however, very similar especially infectious diseases.Citation7 The overall objective of this article was to provide an overall description of access to vaccine, focusing on the new and innovative vaccines among countries in the ASEAN region. By extracting data of vaccine introduction and HTA processes within countries from Gavi, World Health Organization database, government official websites, and peer-review journal articles, we began our analysis with “Where are we?”, a description of current situation of access in terms of vaccines that are currently listed in national immunization program (NIP).Citation8 We then explored HTA decision framework for the introduction of new vaccine into the country. Challenges in access to new and innovative vaccines were then analyzed to investigate the role of HTA in decision-making process in these countries.
Where are we?
Current situation of access to new and innovative vaccines in ASEAN region
Emerging vaccines
In the past 15 years, several new vaccines became available in the market including rotavirus in the year 2006 (RotaTeq, Merck), human papilloma virus (HPV) in the year 2006 (Gardasil, Merck), pneumococcal vaccine (PCV) in the year 2000 (Prevnar7, Pfizer), and dengue vaccine in the year 2015 (Dengxavia, Sanofi).Citation9 Most of these breakthrough innovations offer protection against infectious diseases that have never been prevented before. Currently, rotavirus, HPV, and PCV vaccine are recommended by WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE) to be included in NIP in every country while dengue vaccine is recommended for only high-risk population.Citation6,Citation8 Variation in access to these vaccines, however, was found when comparing NIP in ASEAN countries. HPV vaccine is an emerging vaccine that has been included in most NIP (seven out of ten ASEAN countries) including Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, Brunei, Philippines, Indonesia, and Lao PDR.Citation10–Citation15 NIP in six countries including Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Myanmar, Philippines, and Singapore have already included PCV in their immunization schedule.Citation15–Citation19 Rotavirus vaccine is currently included in only one NIP, Thailand and is under planning to be included in Lao PDR, Myanmar, and Vietnam NIP.Citation6,Citation15,Citation20 Dengue vaccine even though protect citizens from one of the most common infectious diseases in the region is currently included in Philippines NIP and are planned to be included in Indonesia NIPCitation6 as listed in .
Table 1. Access to vaccine through national immunization program among ASEAN countries.
Comparing between countries, access to emerging vaccines is highest in Philippines (three out of four emerging vaccine analyzed in this article) while Vietnam even in Gavi-eligible countries still have no access to any of these emerging vaccines. The time of implementation has shown that Singapore is one of the fastest countries implementing new vaccines into their NIP.
The variation in access across countries is partly explained by the variation in prices of these vaccines in the region. Differences of vaccine prices can be as high as 30 times differences as found in PCV and rotavirus vaccine. Prices of PCV are approximately 111 USD in Singapore and a subsidized donor price of 3 USD in Gavi-eligible countries.Citation27,Citation28 Rotavirus vaccine’s prices also show the same trend as prices were reported highest at 70 USD in Singapore and lowest in Gavi-eligible countries at 2 USD.Citation27,Citation28 Anecdotal reports have shown that the vaccine price is partly determined by the country’s affordability and its negotiation power and decision framework for reimbursement process.
Combined vaccines
Despite not an emerging vaccine, combining vaccines into one single product has also been an interest in immunization program around the globe. Advantages of combined vaccine include fewer injection and thus higher compliance rate especially for complex immunization schedule, better vaccination coverage and timely vaccination, lower vaccine administration cost as well as storage and cold chain requirement for vaccine.Citation29 Diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis-based (DTP-based) vaccine is the combined vaccine that has been used in the immunization program around the globe since 1948.Citation26 With an advanced in biotechnology, inactivated polio vaccine (IPV), Haemophilus influenzae vaccine (Hib), and hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) are added to the DTP-based vaccine. The most recent combined vaccine was commercialized into the market in the year 2018 in the US which combine DPT vaccines with inactivated poliovirus, H. influenzae type b and hepatitis b.Citation9 Currently, all countries in ASEAN have used at least pentavalent DTP-based vaccine in their immunization schedule except Brunei in which hexavalent DTP-based vaccine has already been included in NIP. For pentavalent DTP-based vaccine, DTwP-Hib-HB vaccine is currently used in NIP in seven out of ten countries including Thailand, Indonesia, Cambodia, Philippines, Lao PDR, Myanmar, and Vietnam while DTaP-Hib-IPV vaccine is currently used in NIP in Singapore and Malaysia.Citation6,Citation30 The extent in which pentavalent- and hexavalent-based vaccine is first implemented in NIP in ASEAN countries is more than 10 years in which Malaysia is the first country to include DTaP-Hib-IPV in 2008 and Thailand is the last country to include DTwP-Hib-HB in 2019.Citation31,Citation32 Differences in prices of combined DTP-based vaccine were found similarly to other emerging vaccines as prices in self-funded countries and Gavi-eligible countries vary considerably. Prices of DTwP-Hib-HB are 24 USD in Thailand and 1 USD as a subsidized donor price in Gavi-eligible countries.Citation24,Citation28
HTA decision framework for the introduction of new vaccine into the country
We used new vaccine adoption decision-making frameworks developed by Burchett et al. and identified HTA-related criteria to analyze HTA role in decision-making process in the region.Citation5 These criteria include the importance of the health problem (burden of disease), vaccine characteristics (safety, efficacy, and effectiveness), financial economic issues (economic evaluation and budget impact analysis), ethical, organizational, social, and legal aspects (feasibility, vaccine supply, acceptability, equity, ethics, cold-chain readiness, and vaccine management system) as listed in .
Table 2. Decision framework for the introduction of new vaccine.
We have found that decision framework for the introduction of new vaccine in ASEAN countries is vastly different. This is due to the fact that ASEAN region houses countries with different health system context as well as decision framework for new vaccine introduction.Citation3 Countries in ASEAN region could be sorted into two groups; the Gavi-eligible countries and countries which fully self-finance their immunization program.Citation33 Four countries in the region, namely Myanmar, Vietnam, Cambodia, and Lao PDR are currently eligible for new vaccines support from the Gavi. Vietnam and Lao PDR are now in preparatory transition phase of graduating from Gavi’s support and to fully self-finance in 2020 and 2022, respectively to promote country ownership on national EPI.Citation37 While Cambodia and Myanmar when reach Gavi’s eligibility criteria, will also have to graduate from Gavi support. In Gavi-eligible countries, only WHO-prequalified vaccines are used in the NIP and currently purchased through the mechanisms of the United Nations Children’s Fund Supply Division (UNICEF SD).Citation6 Indonesia has recently graduated from Gavi support in 2018. Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei, Philippines, and Thailand are countries in the region in which vaccines are self-financed using government budget and no support from the international organization.Citation33
In the countries where vaccines are self-financed using government budget, the HTA criteria for decision making to include vaccine in NIP are mostly clearly established.Citation3,Citation36,Citation43 These countries usually have HTA guidelines, institutionalized HTA bodies, and require HTA to support for new vaccine adoption. Burden of disease and vaccine characteristics (vaccine safety and efficacy) are among the most common criteria used by these countries. Economic aspect of candidate vaccines considered, which is of the major criteria for decision making, are cost-effectiveness results. However, with explicit criteria set defined by the decision-making body in each country, the details of the evidences used to support decision making varies. For example, the requirement for the use of health economics modeling is different across countries. Thailand has stated clearly in the national health technology assessment guideline that health economics model is required for the HTA of vaccines preferably dynamic transmission model or typical static model while Singapore only requires health economics modeling without type of modeling specification and Malaysia do not have specific guidance for economic evaluation of vaccine.Citation44
HTA structure and utilization of HTA for decision-making process in Gavi-eligible countries are however, not well established. Vietnamese Ministry of Health (MoH) has just started conducting HTA as well as reviewing evidences from the published literature. However, HTA has not been fully and formally utilized for regulatory and reimbursement decisions for health technologies with vaccine being no exception.Citation4 In Lao PDR, there is a lack of capacity in HTA. It was found that there have been no changes to the benefit packages for the public insurance health benefit schemes in recent years.Citation45 In Myanmar, the use of HTA to support decision-making process was reported, as cost-effectiveness analysis played a crucial role in the policy adoption of Maternal and Child Health Voucher Scheme in which infant immunization is a part of the program.Citation46 However, the use of HTA in a routine decision made by the government is still far from the ideal. In Cambodia, the availability of evidences and data of health technology are increasing but still lack of adoption guideline resulting in weak research capacity in the country.Citation34
Next to HTA decision frameworks but related to it, the establishment of National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) in each country is worth mentioned here. NITAGs have been established in all countries in the region except for Brunei.Citation30 However, a wide range of the time NITAGs first established in these countries were found. The NITAGs have been in existence in Thailand since 1970, while the establishment of NITAGs in Cambodia was not long ago in 2016.Citation47 Therefore, the structure of NITAGs as well as the policy process each NITAGs involved in is varied by level of establishment. It is not clear in the literature how much NITAGs and HTA processes are interrelated in these countries. Even the roles of NITAGs maybe different between countries but the overall objective of NITAGs is mainly to assess evidences regarding the vaccine, as well as review and recommend evidence-based immunization policies.Citation48 With the different experience level of NITAGs in this region, the use of evidences like HTA in supporting decision making to adopt new vaccine would be different.
Vaccine and disease characteristics
In order to observe the role of HTA in decision-making process of emerging vaccines in the region, we summarize the evidences available from some these vaccines as well as the disease the vaccine is preventing as an illustration.
Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV)
Pneumococcal infection is an infection that can lead to serious complications such as meningitis, septicemia, and pneumonia. A pneumococcal conjugate vaccine containing 7 serotypes (PCV-7) came on the global market in 2000.Citation9 In 2009 and 2010, two more pneumococcal conjugate vaccines were launched into the market with more serotypes added; the 10-valent (PCV-10) and the 13-valent (PCV-13) vaccines.Citation9 Since then PCV-7 is gradually being removed from the market as it was replaced by the two new PCVs. Both PCV10 and PCV13 have been shown to be safe and effective and WHO recommends the inclusion of PCVs in childhood immunization programs worldwide.Citation8 In terms of the burden of the disease, Indonesia, Vietnam, Philippines, and Myanmar are among the top 15 countries worldwide reported with the highest number of new cases of clinical pneumonia in 2008.Citation49–Citation51 Several clinical studies of PCV vaccine in Singapore, Thailand, Lao PDR, Malaysia, and Cambodia have demonstrated good safety profile of the vaccine as well as its efficacy against invasive pneumococcal diseases (IPDs).Citation16,Citation52–Citation54 However, several cost-effectiveness analyses of PCVs conducted in Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand have shown that PCVs usually PCV-10 and PCV-13 are a cost-effective strategy.Citation55–Citation57 Cost-effectiveness analysis in Singapore has shown that PCV-7 is a very cost-effective strategy while PCV-10 and PCV-13 are moderately cost-effective strategy. In Thailand, PCV-10 and PCV-13 are cost effective when considering herd effect. The results were found similar findings in Malaysia. These three studies found common characteristics that the inclusion of herd immunity effects would change the incremental cost effectiveness ratio substantially more favorable.
Rotavirus vaccine (RV)
Acute diarrhea in infant or childhood is typically caused by rotavirus that infects the gastrointestinal tract called “Rotavirus gastroenteritis.”Citation58 The incidence of infection is resembled in ASEAN countries member in which diarrhea and gastroenteritis is common and approximately 15 cases per 1,000 children are hospitalized annually for acute gastroenteritis.Citation59 WHO recommends the inclusion of rotavirus vaccine in NIPs worldwide especially in high-risk country.Citation8 However, rotavirus vaccine evidences conducted locally in Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Malaysia showed controversial efficacy and safety data.Citation60–Citation62 Efficacy in Indonesia is lower than estimated in other countries while safety data are available in Singapore only.Citation60,Citation63 No serious adverse events occurred. Several economic evaluation studies for rotavirus vaccination were conducted in Lao PDR, Indonesia, Cambodia, Myanmar, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, and Vietnam and most found that the vaccine is a cost-effective strategy.Citation63–Citation65
Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a group of more than 100 types of virus infection that spread throughout the world. The infection can commonly be transmitted by sexual activity and can possibly contribute to cancerous cervical lesions and turn to cervical cancer.Citation66 WHO reported that two types of high-risk HPV (Citation16 and Citation18) cause 70% of cervical cancer worldwide.Citation67 The primary prevention strategy is HPV vaccine injection for girls between 9 and 4 years before first sexual intercourse.Citation68 Bi- and quadrivalent HPV vaccine become available on market since 2009 and 2014, respectively.Citation9 Both of them have been shown to be safe and effective in several studies from Thailand, Indonesia, and Malaysia.Citation69–Citation71From a review by Arbyn et al., excellent protection from cervical precancer is found in bi- and quadrivalent vaccine and the efficacy is lower in middle age women (24–45 years).Citation72 Several economic evaluation studies for HPV immunization were conducted in Lao PDR, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam and most found that the vaccine is a very cost-effective strategy.Citation69,Citation73–Citation77
Dengue vaccine (DV)
Dengue is the most frequent and rapidly spreading mosquito-borne virus that affects countries in the ASEAN region greatly. In 2019, there were 124,751 reported dengue cases in Vietnam, 95,000 cases in Thailand and 110,399 cases in Malaysia.Citation32,Citation78 The need for a dengue vaccine is more pressing than ever. Currently, there is only one dengue vaccine available in the market. Two large phase 3 trials which were conducted in Philippines, Indonesia, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Thailand have shown that overall efficacy of vaccine is 56.5% and can lower the risk of dengue hemorrhagic fever by 80%.Citation79–Citation82 The efficacy is however changed by the immune status of the recipients; 74.3% in previously exposed patients vs 35.5% in naive patients.Citation83 This finding has implications for vaccine introduction and implementation as the SAGE recommended a “prevaccination screening strategy” to be included as a dengue vaccination program, in which only dengue-seropositive persons are vaccinated.Citation84 Several economic evaluation studies for dengue vaccine were conducted in Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam and most found that the vaccine is a cost-effective strategy.Citation85,Citation86
Combined vaccine
The use of combined vaccine depends mainly on whether to include the additional vaccine in the NIP. According to WHO recommended vaccines worldwide, diphtheria, pertussis (whooping cough), and tetanus (DTP) containing vaccine is listed in NIP in every ASEAN member countries for decades same as other vaccines such as polio (OPV/IPV) vaccine and hepatitis B (HepB) vaccine. But some are recently included to the programs in a last few years such as H. influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine in Thailand.Citation8,Citation9,Citation32
Challenges in access to new and innovative vaccines
Access to new vaccines in the region face several challenges
Before addressing these challenges, it should be noted that access to vaccine in this study is limited to access through NIP in the public sector but not through the private sector. We have found that challenges in access to new and innovative vaccines vary by health system context of each country as well as evidences available for each vaccine and the disease the vaccine is preventing. The situation of access to new vaccines in the region is not low since many countries especially low-to-middle- income countries have access to most new and innovative vaccines through Gavi. The major challenge is however, how to sustain the progress in access to these vaccines especially after graduating from Gavi support in particular in large countries like Indonesia. The case of access to PCV vaccine is a good illustration of this challenge. The use of PCV vaccine in self-financed countries is low with Singapore and Philippines being the only two countries provide PCV vaccine for free under their NIP.Citation6,Citation15 The expansion of access in region is therefore through countries whose PCV vaccine is supported by Gavi. This echoed the situation observed around the globe in which children in some of the countries with the weakest economies are actually better protected against infectious disease than are those in some wealthier countries. As income in these countries grow and at the same time the cut in external support is anticipated, these countries could face the same challenges as wealthier countries with fewer resources.
Another challenge is the HTA evidences around vaccine and immunization programs for introduction decisions. HTA evidences conducted locally could have an impact on the decision to adopt vaccine into NIP. For example, HTA evidences of rotavirus vaccine have shown good safety profile and vaccine efficacy around the globe. Local data, however, have shown that efficacy in some country in the region may not be the same as those reported globally. As a result, the vaccine has been first adopted recently in only one country, Thailand.Citation6 The other reason that may delay the adoption of rotavirus vaccine especially in Islamic countries like Indonesia is the local cultural and religious value of vaccine itself. Local HTA evidence has shown that the absence of “Halal” labeling is not deem acceptable and rotavirus will not be included in NIP unless halal certified rotavirus vaccine becomes available.Citation87 Another example of how HTA evidences could impact decision making by NIP is the case of dengue vaccine. Even though dengue infection is one of the most common infections in the region and the region is in desperate need for dengue infection prevention, the implementation of vaccine in real world is complicated. The efficacy data of the vaccine show that the protection of dengue infection depends on the immune status of the recipients. Therefore, the “pre-vaccination screening strategy” is required and this administrative barrier may be one factor delaying access to dengue vaccine in the region. The other important factor might related to the concern of the safety of dengue vaccine as it has been reported after the implementation of dengue vaccine in the Philippines.Citation88 It is obvious from this finding that HTA evidences may not be the only factor that affects access to new and innovative vaccine but if HTA evidences do not meet the pre-specified criteria especially the uncertainties in safety and efficacy profile of the vaccine, the vaccine is unlikely to adopted. For HPV vaccines evidence around implementation challenges are around vaccinating adolescent girls outside traditional EPI programs. The optimal delivery strategy and cost implications poses issues for countries considering introducing HPV vaccines, in addition to procurement prices for non-Gavi-eligible countries.Citation89,Citation90
Capacity of the local country to conduct HTA or appraise HTA evidences from other sources could become a major challenge in the future. Vaccines used in Gavi-eligible countries are selected for recommendation based on donors and technical agencies’ preferences and priorities (e.g., Gavi, WHO, and UNICEF). Since these countries will finally graduate from the support, the use of HTA evidences to support decision making is necessary to sustain programs in particular when countries graduate from donor support. HTA evidences for vaccine is complex and the availability of local data could have changed the decision in some cases. Take PCV, for example, even though HTA evidences is strong that pneumococcal infection is common in the region and clinical study shows good efficacy against the infection, local data on serotype prevalence of pneumococcal infection and possibilities of cross-effect between different serotypes is not readily available in many countries in the region. Cost-effectiveness results of PCV also depend mainly on the inclusion of herd immunity effect in the analysis. The inclusion of herd immunity using static model can only be considered reliable if high-quality surveillance data are incorporated into the analysis. The inclusion of these kinds of analysis needs skilled researchers to conduct, appraise, and translate the results into policy. The latter example raises another issue of HTA structure available in the region. Even though, we have found that most countries in this region have established NITAGs to support decision making regarding immunization service, it is clear that most Gavi-eligible countries are far behind from having the HTA structure required to support local decision making. This includes not only an HTA unit and skilled researchers but also local data needed for the HTA.
Unquestionably, one of the contributing factors to access is the price of the vaccine. We have found that variability of vaccine’s price in the region is high especially when comparing the price of vaccine procured by local government and the price of vaccine procured by Gavi for Gavi-eligible countries, for example, price of rotavirus vaccine in Singapore can be as high as $USD 100 per doseCitation27 compare to $USD3 per dose procured by Gavi.Citation28 Also, when price of the vaccine is considered high, even when most local cost-effectiveness results have shown that the vaccine is a cost-effective strategy, the vaccine would not be included in NIP. Situation of access to rotavirus vaccine is a good instance. Access to rotavirus vaccine as aforementioned is low. This phenomenon however is observed in other parts of the world as the majority of countries (57%, 110/194) had not introduced universal rotavirus vaccine and high-income countries, on average, had poorer rotavirus vaccine coverage compared to low and lower-middle income countries.Citation21 Contributing factors of low access to rotavirus vaccine may be due to several reasons including low perceived risk of disease, safety concerns around intussusception, and lastly the pricing of the vaccine and the budget impact and financial sustainability. The situation of access may change since new rotavirus vaccine from other manufacturers in India and Indonesia become available in the market and as a result, a lower vaccine price and acceptable to Islamic countries.
For vaccines that already have high access like HPV vaccine, the challenge for HPV vaccine is not on whether to include HPV in NIP but on how to sustainably implement the vaccine in the country’s immunization schedule. In Thailand, HPV vaccine is currently available for free under NIP for girls age 11 years old while eligible population for HPV vaccine in Malaysia is 13 years old.Citation30 With this variation in immunization schedule, countries will need to consider the expansion of eligible population as well as delivery strategy, for example, school-based program versus catch up program, number of doses provided, the supply security of the vaccine available from the manufacturer, and lastly the long-term financial sustainability.
Lastly, time to first introduction could be accelerated for faster access. Combined vaccine, for example, even has already been included in NIP in every country in the region. The time of first introduction, however, is lengthy as the first country to introduce combined vaccine was Malaysia in 2008 and the last country, Thailand, was in 2019.Citation31,Citation32 This may be due the fact that the price of these vaccine is considerable high among others such as 33 USD for DTaP-Hib-IPV in Thailand.Citation24 Availability of local data on HTA evidence again could accelerate faster adoption of new vaccine. It is obvious that HTA structure, for example, HTA body, the use of evidenced-based information to support new vaccine adoption in these countries is still not established. Capacity building for evidences generation and evidences appraisal will then cannot be overlooked.
Future directions
A great deal of progress was made in increasing access to new and innovative vaccine in this region. Still, some of these emerging vaccines have not been introduced in most countries in the region. To expand access to new and innovative vaccine for this region should center on improving the use of HTA evidences for new vaccine adoption. Decision framework or system to support decision in all ASEAN countries should be set up and link with global initiatives such as the Decide Health Decision Hub established in 2019 to facilitate online meeting space for people working on supporting decision making in health through an evidence-based process.Citation22 Since some countries in ASEAN already have an established HTA system and expertise, for example, Thailand,Citation43 developing countries can use lesson-learned or developed tools and implement them in their country. Data and information can also be shared as some of the characteristics of the population in the region is not much different. HTA data sometimes can therefore be generalizable from country to the other. Data sharing can also include the sharing of pricing data or further develop to the implementation of pool procurement in the region. Some of these initiatives have already been ongoing as Gavi financially supports eligible and transitioning countries with health systems strengthening grants (HSS). The objective of Gavi HSS support is to address system bottlenecks to achieve better immunization outcomes, including increased vaccination coverage and more equitable access to immunization. Another movement that has been initiated in the strengthening and sustaining of NITAGs globally. This includes intercountry NITAGs collaboration, the founding of Global NITAGs Network (GNN),Citation23 and the launch of the updated NITAGs Resource Center (NRC)Citation25 and in the future the potential of having Regional Technical Advisory Groups on Immunization (RTAGs) and regional networks.Citation25 If the HTA structure is to be further established, future efforts should be focused on expediting the research and development of vaccines for disease that meet the needs of the region and country requirement, for example, halal certified vaccine, local infectious disease using different tools, for example, WHO’s CAPACITI (Country-led Assessment for Prioritization of Immunization) project which will use HTA frameworks and evidences on supporting countries in the process of decision making (deliberate processes using mutlicriteria decision analysis: MCDA) for prioritization of vaccines.Citation35
This review emphasizes how international donor like Gavi played a major role in increasing access in this region and how HTA evidences played a role in access to emerging vaccine in self-financed countries. Yet there is still a need to further increase access to new vaccine as well as expand coverage to these vaccines, in both Gavi and non-Gavi countries.
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Acknowledgments
RH is a staff member of the WHO. The views are his and do not necessarily represent the views of the WHO.
References
- World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for routine immunization - summary tables 2019. [updated 26 April 2019; accessed 2020 Jan 09]. . https://www.who.int/immunization/policy/immunization_tables/en/.
- Griesenauer RH, Kinch MS. An overview of FDA-approved vaccines & their innovators. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017;16(12):1253–66. doi:10.1080/14760584.2017.1383159.
- Tantivess S, Chalkidou K, Tritasavit N, Teerawattananon Y. Health Technology Assessment capacity development in low- and middle-income countries: experiences from the international units of HITAP and NICE [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research. 2017;6:2119. doi:10.12688/f1000research.13180.1.
- Quang VT, Pham T. Health technology assessment in developing countries: a brief introduction for vietnamese health-care policymakers. Asian J Pharm. 2018;12:S1–S7.
- Burchett HED, Mounier-Jack S, Griffiths UK, Mills AJ. National decision-making on adopting new vaccines: a systematic review. Health Policy Plan. 2011;27(suppl_2):ii62–ii76. doi:10.1093/heapol/czr049.
- The ASEAN Secretariat. Report of the ASEAN vaccine baseline survey (AVBS) 2017: - current situation and gap analysis. Jakarta: The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN); 2017 August 2019.
- Gupta I, Guin P. Communicable diseases in the South-East Asia Region of the World Health Organization: towards a more effective response. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(3):199–205. doi:10.2471/BLT.09.065540.
- World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for routine immunization - summary tables 2019 [updated 2019 April 26] [accessed 2020 Jan 09]. https://www.who.int/immunization/policy/immunization_tables/en/.
- Centers of Disease Control and Prevention. List of vaccines used in United States 2018. [updated 2018 April 13] [accessed 2020 Jan 09]. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/vaccines-list.html.
- L Ag B, Serrano B, Mena M, Gómez D, Muñoz J, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S Human papillomavirus and related diseases in Brunei. Summary report. ICO/IARC Information Centre on HPV and Cancer (HPV Information Centre); 17 June 2019.
- Bruni LAG, Serrano B, Mena M, Gómez D, Muñoz J, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S Human papillomavirus and related diseases in Philippines. Summary report. ICO/IARC Information Centre on HPV and Cancer (HPV Information Centre); 17 June 2019.
- Bruni LAG, Serrano B, Mena M, Gómez D, Muñoz J, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S Human papillomavirus and related diseases in Thailand. Summary report. ICO/IARC Information Centre on HPV and Cancer (HPV Information Centre); 17 June 2019.
- Bruni LAG, Serrano B, Mena M, Gómez D, Muñoz J, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S Human papillomavirus and related diseases in Singapore. Summary report. ICO/IARC Information Centre on HPV and Cancer (HPV Information Centre); 17 June 2019.
- Bruni LAG, Serrano B, Mena M, Gómez D, Muñoz J, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S Human papillomavirus and related diseases in Malaysia. Summary report. ICO/IARC Information Centre on HPV and Cancer (HPV Information Centre); 17 June 2019.
- World Health Organization. Year of introduction of selected vaccines database 2019 [updated 2019 December 13] [cited 2020 Jan 10]. https://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/data/en/.
- Eng P, Lim LH, Loo CM, Low JA, Tan C, Tan EK, Wong SY, Setia S. Role of pneumococcal vaccination in prevention of pneumococcal disease among adults in Singapore. Int J Gen Med. 2014;7:179–91. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S54963.
- Satzke C, Dunne EM, Choummanivong M, Ortika BD, Neal EFG, Pell CL, Nation ML, Fox KK, Nguyen CD, Gould KA, et al. Pneumococcal carriage in vaccine-eligible children and unvaccinated infants in Lao PDR two years following the introduction of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Vaccine. 2019;37(2):296–305. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.077.
- Sundoro J Immunization programme in Indonesia: overview (focusing on Streptococcus pneumonia wholecell vaccine). 4th International Conference on Vaccines & Vaccination; Valencia Convention Centre, Spain, 2014. p. 126.
- Turner P, Turner C, Suy K, Soeng S, Ly S, Miliya T, Goldblatt D, Day NPJ. Pneumococcal infection among children before introduction of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, Cambodia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(11):2080–83. doi:10.3201/eid2111.150914.
- Muangchana C Rota vaccine introduction in the Thai National program. 16th Annual Scientific Meeting of CEID; 11 June 2019; School of Public Health, Prince of Wales Hospital Shatin, New Territories (Hong Kong SAR), 2019. p. 1–56.
- Abou-Nader AJ, Sauer MA, Steele AD, Tate JE, Atherly D, Parashar UD, Santosham M, Nelson EAS. Global rotavirus vaccine introductions and coverage: 2006 – 2016. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(9):2281–96. doi:10.1080/21645515.2018.1470725.
- Doherty J. Effective capacity-building strategies for health technology assessment: a rapid review of international experience. South Africa: Discussion Document. School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand; 2015.
- MacDonald NE, Duclos P, Wichmann O, Henaff L, Harnden A, Alshammary A, Tijerino RA, Hall M, Sacarlal J, Singh RR, et al. Moving forward on strengthening and sustaining National immunization technical advisory groups (NITAGs) globally: recommendations from the 2nd global NITAG network meeting. Vaccine. 2017;35(50):6925–30. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.10.048.
- Pediatric department Siriraj hospital. Immunisation schedule for newborn to 18-month child. 2017 [updated 2017] [cited 2020 Jan 19]. https://www.si.mahidol.ac.th/th/department/pediatrics/pdf/service/leftlet/InfectiousDiseases/vaccine_siriraj2560.pdf.
- Adjagba A, Henaff L, Duclos P. The NITAG resource centre (NRC): A one-stop shop towards a collaborative platform. Vaccine. 2015;33.
- Edwards K, Decker M. Pertussis vaccine 5th. USA. p. 471–528.
- uex health insurance. How much do vaccines cost in Singapore? 2018 [updated 09 May 2018] [accessed 2020 Jan 19]. https://uexglobal.com/2018/05/09/costs-vaccinations-singapore/.
- Unicef. Vaccine price data: Unicef for every child; 2019 [updated 19 December 2019 [cited 2020 Jan 19. https://www.unicef.org/supply/index_57476.html.
- Skibinski DA, Baudner BC, Singh M, O’Hagan DT. Combination vaccines. J Glob Infect Dis. 2011;3(1):63–72. doi:10.4103/0974-777X.77298.
- World Health Organization. WHO vaccine-preventable diseases: monitoring system. 2019 global summary 2019 [updated 10 December 2019] [accessed 2020 Jan 09]. https://apps.who.int/immunization_monitoring/globalsummary/.
- Kusnin F Immunisation program in Malaysia. VACCINOLOGY 2017 – III INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM FOR ASIA PACIFIC EXPERTS; Hanoi, Vietnam, 2017.
- Pediatric Infectious Disease Society of Thailand. Immunization recommendation schedule in Thai children 2019. In: media-20190620135123, editor. 2019.
- Gavi The Vaccine Alliance. Eligibility. 2019 [updated 2019] [accessed 2020 Jan 09]. https://www.gavi.org/types-support/sustainability/eligibility.
- Liverani M, Chheng K, Parkhurst J. The making of evidence-informed health policy in Cambodia: knowledge, institutions and processes. BMJ Global Health. 2018;3(3):e000652–e. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000652.
- Rattanavipapong W, Kapoor R, Teerawattananon Y, Luttjeboer J, Botwright S, Archer RA, Giersing B, Hutubessy RCW. Comparing 3 approaches for making vaccine adoption decisions in Thailand. Int J Health Policy Manage. 2020. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2020.01.
- Bakri DDR, Sabirin J, Fuzi SAM, Rahman MA, Mohamad NF, Rashid RAM Health technology assessment manual. Malaysia: Medical Development Division, Ministry of Health; 2015 [cited 2020 Jan 09]. https://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s22255en/s22255en.pdf.
- Gavi The Vaccine Alliance. Transitioning out of Gavi support 2019 [updated 2019] [accessed 2020 Jan 09]. https://www.gavi.org/types-support/sustainability/transition.
- Wilder-Smith A, Flasche S, Smith PG. Vaccine-attributable severe dengue in the Philippines. Lancet. 2019;394(10215):2151–52. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32525-5.
- World Health Organization. 2019. Global Vaccine Action Plan. Regional reports on progress towards GVAP-RVAP goals, Annex to the GVAP review and lessons-learned report.
- Ongpoy R. The National immunization committee (NIC), A Philippine NITAG (National Immunization Technical Advisory Group). J Asian Asso Schools Pharm. 2017;6:47–54.
- Tiong Wei Wei YK. Childhood immunization Health Mo, editor. Singapore. p. 121–33.
- World Health Organization. Regional office for South-East A. The establishment and operation of national immunization technical advisory groups in the WHO South-East Asia Region. New Delhi: World Health Organization. Regional Office for South-East Asia; 2016. p. 2016.
- Teerawattananon Y, Chaikledkaew U. Guidelines for health technology assessment in Thailand Second Edition. Thailand; 2014. accessed 2020 Jan 09. http://www.hitap.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Thai-HTA-guideline-UPDATES-Jmed-with-Cover.pdf.
- Kingkaew P. A way forward for the evaluation of health technologies for infectious diseases. J Med Assoc Thai. 2014;97:S87–93.
- World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific. The Lao People’s Democratic Republic health system review. 2014 [accessed 2020 Jan 09]. http://iris.wpro.who.int/handle/10665.1/10448.
- Pilasant S, Kulpeng W, Werayingyong P, Tritasavit N, Yamabhai I, Teerawattananon Y, Wangmo S, Tantivess S. Maternal and child health voucher scheme in Myanmar: a review of early stage implementation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):600. doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1850-3.
- NITAG RESOURCE CENTER. NITAG STATUS worldwide. 2017 [updated December 2017 [accessed 2020 Jan 13]. http://www.nitag-resource.org/map.
- Duclos P, Ortynsky S, Abeysinghe N, Cakmak N, Janusz C, Jauregui B, Mihigo R, Mosina L, Sadr-Azodi S, Takashima Y, et al. Monitoring of progress in the establishment and strengthening of national immunization technical advisory groups. Vaccine. 2012;30.
- Rudan I, Boschi-Pinto C, Biloglav Z, Mulholland K, Campbell H. Epidemiology and etiology of childhood pneumonia. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86(5):408–16. doi:10.2471/BLT.07.048769.
- Md Yasin R, Raudzah A, Ng AJ, Ng P, Zaidatul A, Asmah I, Murtaza M, Parasakthy N, Mohd Yasmin MY, Cheong YM, et al. Epidemiology of streptococcus pneumoniae infection in Malaysia. Epidemiol Infect. 1999;122:77–82. doi:10.1017/S0950268898001605.
- Piralam B, Tomczyk SM, Rhodes JC, Thamthitiwat S, Gregory CJ, Olsen SJ, Praphasiri P, Sawatwong P, Naorat S, Chantra S, et al. Incidence of Pneumococcal Pneumonia among adults in Rural Thailand, 2006–2011: implications for Pneumococcal vaccine considerations. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93(6):1140–47. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.15-0429.
- Goonewardene ST, Tang C, Tan LT-H, Chan K-G, Lingham P, Lee L-H, Goh B-H, Pusparajah P. Safety and Efficacy of Pneumococcal vaccination in pediatric nephrotic syndrome. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:339. doi:10.3389/fped.2019.00339.
- Turner P, Leab P, Ly S, Sao S, Miliya T, Heffelfinger JD, Batmunkh N, Lessa FC, Walldorf JA, Hyde TB, et al. Impact of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on colonization and invasive disease in cambodian children. Clin Infect Dis. 2019.
- Wongsawat J, Chokephaibulkit K. Implication of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines to public health: thailand perspective. J Med Assoc Thai. 2010;93:S53–60.
- Dilokthornsakul P, Kengkla K, Saokaew S, Permsuwan U, Techasaensiri C, Chotpitayasunondh T, Chaiyakunapruk N. An updated cost-effectiveness analysis of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine among children in Thailand. Vaccine. 2019;37(32):4551–60. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.015.
- Tyo KR, Rosen MM, Zeng W, Yap M, Pwee KH, Ang LW, Shepard DS. Cost-effectiveness of conjugate pneumococcal vaccination in Singapore: comparing estimates for 7-valent, 10-valent, and 13-valent vaccines. Vaccine. 2011;29(38):6686–94. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.06.091.
- Wu DB-C, Roberts C, Lee VWY, Hong L-W, Tan KK, Mak V, Lee KKC. Cost-effectiveness analysis of infant universal routine pneumococcal vaccination in Malaysia and Hong Kong. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016;12(2):403–16. doi:10.1080/21645515.2015.1067351.
- Crawford SE, Ramani S, Tate JE, Parashar UD, Svensson L, Hagbom M, Franco MA, Greenberg HB, O’Ryan M, Kang G, et al. Rotavirus infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3(1):17083. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.83.
- Kawai K, O’Brien MA, Goveia MG, Mast TC, El Khoury AC. Burden of rotavirus gastroenteritis and distribution of rotavirus strains in Asia: A systematic review. Vaccine. 2012;30(7):1244–54. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.092.
- Clark A, van Zandvoort K, Flasche S, Sanderson C, Bines J, Tate J, Parashar U, Jit M. Efficacy of live oral rotavirus vaccines by duration of follow-up: a meta-regression of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(7):717–27. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30126-4.
- Phua KB, Lim FS, Lau YL, Nelson EAS, Huang LM, Quak SH, Lee BW, Doorn LJV, Teoh YL, Tang H, et al. Rotavirus vaccine RIX4414 efficacy sustained during the third year of life: A randomized clinical trial in an Asian population. Vaccine. 2012;30(30):4552–57. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.03.030.
- Tharmaphornpilas P, Jiamsiri S, Boonchaiya S, Rochanathimoke O, Thinyounyong W, Tuntiwitayapun S, Guntapong R, Riewpaiboon A, Rasdjarmrearnsook A-O, Glass RI, et al. Evaluating the first introduction of rotavirus vaccine in Thailand: moving from evidence to policy. Vaccine. 2017;35(5):796–801. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.12.043.
- Phua KB, Lim FS, Lau YL, Nelson EAS, Huang LM, Quak SH, Lee BW, Teoh YL, Tang H, Boudville I, et al. Safety and efficacy of human rotavirus vaccine during the first 2 years of life in Asian infants: randomised, double-blind, controlled study. Vaccine. 2009;27(43):5936–41. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.07.098.
- Atherly D, Dreibelbis R, Parashar UD, Levin C, Wecker J, Rheingans RD. Rotavirus vaccination: cost-effectiveness and impact on child mortality in developing countries. J Infect Dis. 2009;200(Suppl 1):S28–38. doi:10.1086/605033.
- Chotivitayatarakorn P, Chotivitayatarakorn P, Poovorawan Y. Cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination part of the National Immunization Program for Thai children. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2010;41:114–25.
- Braaten KP, Laufer MR. Human papillomavirus (HPV), HPV-related disease, and the HPV vaccine. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008;1:2–10.
- World Health Organization. Human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer. 2019 [updated 24 January 2019] [accessed 2020 Jan 09]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/human-papillomavirus-(hpv)-and-cervical-cancer.
- World Health Organization. Human papillomavirus vaccines: WHO position paper, May 20172017 12 MAY 2017 [accessed 2020 Jan 18]; 92:[241–68 pp.]. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/255353/WER9219.pdf;jsessionid=7EEB41D6E39E3E04DBED47589DEE2C6A?sequence=1.
- Kosen S, Andrijono A, Ocviyanti D, Indriatmi W. The cost-effectiveness of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccination in Indonesia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18(7):2011–17. doi:10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.7.2011.
- Munoz N, Manalastas R Jr., Pitisuttithum P, Tresukosol D, Monsonego J, Ault K, Clavel C, Luna J, Myers E, Hood S, et al. Safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, 18) recombinant vaccine in women aged 24–45 years: a randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9679):1949–57. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60691-7.
- Satari HI, Sundoro J, Andrijono A, Hadinegoro SR, Syafriyal S, Tandy G, Karolina S. Post marketing surveillance study of 2nd dose quadrivalent human papilloma virus vaccine in elementary school children in jakarta, indonesia: safety result and implementation of school-based HPV immunization program. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019;20(3):869–75. doi:10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.3.869.
- Arbyn M, Xu L. Efficacy and safety of prophylactic HPV vaccines. A Cochrane review of randomized trials. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2018;17(12):1085–91. doi:10.1080/14760584.2018.1548282.
- Chanthavilay P, Reinharz D, Mayxay M, Phongsavan K, Marsden DE, Moore L, White LJ. The economic evaluation of human papillomavirus vaccination strategies against cervical cancer in women in Lao PDR: a mathematical modelling approach. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):418. doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1662-5.
- Termrungruanglert W, Havanond P, Khemapech N, Lertmaharit S, Pongpanich S, Khorprasert C, Taneepanichskul S. Cost and Effectiveness Evaluation of Prophylactic HPV Vaccine in Developing Countries. Value Health. 2012;15(1,Supplement):S29–S34. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2011.11.007.
- Tay SK, Lee B-W, Sohn WY, Lee IH, Mathur G, Sanicas M, Van Kriekinge G. Cost-effectiveness of two-dose human papillomavirus vaccination in Singapore. Singapore Med J. 2018;59(7):370–82. doi:10.11622/smedj.2017085.
- Ezat WP, Aljunid S. Cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination in the prevention of cervical cancer in Malaysia. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. 2010;11:79–90.
- Van Minh H, My NTT, Jit M. Cervical cancer treatment costs and cost-effectiveness analysis of human papillomavirus vaccination in Vietnam: a PRIME modeling study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):353. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2297-x.
- World Health Organization Western Pacific Region. Update on the Dengue situation in the Western Pacific Region. 2019 [updated 19 December 2019] cited 2020 Jan 09]. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/wpro—documents/emergency/surveillance/dengue/dengue-20191219.pdf?sfvrsn=b42cfbd0_22.
- Capeding MR, Tran NH, Hadinegoro SR, Ismail HI, Chotpitayasunondh T, Chua MN, Luong CQ, Rusmil K, Wirawan DN, Nallusamy R, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of a novel tetravalent dengue vaccine in healthy children in Asia: a phase 3, randomised, observer-masked, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9951):1358–65. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61060-6.
- Sabchareon A, Wallace D, Sirivichayakul C, Limkittikul K, Chanthavanich P, Suvannadabba S, Jiwariyavej V, Dulyachai W, Pengsaa K, Wartel TA. Protective efficacy of the recombinant, live-attenuated, CYD tetravalent dengue vaccine in Thai schoolchildren: a randomised, controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet. 2012;380(9853):1559–67. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61428-7.
- Tran H. Safety and immunogenicity of recombinant, live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine (CYD- TDV) in healthy vietnamese adults and children. J Vaccines Vaccin. 2012;03.
- Sin Leo Y, Wilder-Smith A, Archuleta S, Shek LP, Chong CY, Nam Leong H, Yong Low C, Oh MLH, Bouckenooghe A, Wartel TA, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of recombinant tetravalent dengue vaccine (CYD-TDV) in individuals aged 2–45 years. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012;8(9):1259–71. doi:10.4161/hv.21224.
- Shafie AA, Yeo HY, Coudeville L, Steinberg L, Gill BS, Jahis R, HSS A-S. The potential cost effectiveness of different dengue vaccination programmes in Malaysia: a value-based pricing assessment using dynamic transmission mathematical modelling. PharmacoEconomics. 2017;35(5):575–89. doi:10.1007/s40273-017-0487-3.
- World Health Organization. Revised SAGE recommendation on use of dengue vaccine. 2018 [updated 19 April 2018] [accessed 2020 Apr 18]. https://www.who.int/immunization/diseases/dengue/revised_SAGE_recommendations_dengue_vaccines_apr2018/en/.
- Carrasco LR, Lee LK, Lee VJ, Ooi EE, Shepard DS, Thein TL, Gan V, Cook AR, Lye D, Ng LC, et al. Economic impact of dengue illness and the cost-effectiveness of future vaccination programs in Singapore. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(12):e1426–e. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001426.
- Zeng W, Halasa-Rappel YA, Baurin N, Coudeville L, Shepard DS. Cost-effectiveness of dengue vaccination in ten endemic countries. Vaccine. 2018;36(3):413–20. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.11.064.
- Padmawati RS, Heywood A, Sitaresmi MN, Atthobari J, MacIntyre CR, Soenarto Y, Seale H. Religious and community leaders’ acceptance of rotavirus vaccine introduction in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):368. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-6706-4.
- World Health Organization. Safety of dengue vaccine in the Philippines: WHO weekly epidemiological record. 2018 [updated 20 July 2018] [cited 2020 Apr 08]. https://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/committee/topics/dengue/June_2018/en/.
- Botwright S, Holroyd T, Nanda S, Bloem P, Griffiths UK, Sidibe A, Hutubessy RCW. Experiences of operational costs of HPV vaccine delivery strategies in Gavi-supported demonstration projects. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0182663–e. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182663.
- Setiawan D, Oktora MP, Hutubessy R, Riewpaiboon A, Postma MJ. The health-economic studies of HPV vaccination in Southeast Asian countries: a systematic review. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017;16(9):933–43. doi:10.1080/14760584.2017.1357472.