1,405
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical – Commentary

Minimizing shoulder injury related to vaccine administration

Pages 1-2 | Received 10 May 2021, Accepted 26 May 2021, Published online: 26 Jul 2021

Shoulder injury related to vaccine administrationCitation1 is generally mild and transient with medically attended events being uncommon, most often reported by the vaccine recipient.

Medically attended events range from any condition for which medical attention is sought and include serious events such as those associated with persistent disability, hospitalization and death. These can be divided into three groups;Citation1 nerve palsies (radial and anterior branch of the axillary nerve); musculoskeletal injuries (bone, articular injury, subacromial/subdeltoid bursitis, and rotator cuff tendinopathy) and cutaneous reactions (subcutaneous nodules, localized lipoatrophy, sterile abscess, local sepsis – cellulitis, abscess, and pyomyositis, infectious subcutaneous emphysema and embolia cutis medicamentosa – Nicolau syndrome). A musculoskeletal syndrome termed SIRVA (Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration) characterized by the rapid onset of shoulder pain and persisting dysfunction after deltoid muscle vaccination has been reported.Citation2 This is consideredCitation2 to be an immune-mediated inflammatory reaction resulting in bursitis, tendonitis and adhesive capsulitis. However, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation ProgramCitation3 now considers that this syndrome results from “improper – that is, negligent – administration technique”.

Mandatory evidence-based guidelines (EB) are required to be propagated by National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) to minimize these injuries and maintain public confidence in COVID-19 vaccination programs. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has provided strong recommendationCitation4 for selection of deltoid injection site,Citation5 needle length,Citation6 routeCitation7 and technique of injectionCitation8 and aspiration before injection.Citation9

However, clinical equipoise,Citation10 defined as “genuine uncertainty in the expert medical community about the preferred treatment” exists for skin disinfection prior to injection and the gauge of needle to be used for intramuscular injection in adults.

There is no consensus on skin disinfection prior to vaccine administration among NITAGs.Citation11 In Australia, an ex-cathedra statement by Del Mar et al.Citation12 based on tangential data not involving intramuscular injection of vaccines resulted in the recommended cessation of this practice. A similar recommendation was made in Canada as a consequence of an underpowered studyCitation13 with multiple different vaccines, with different routes of administration, using injection site reaction (ISR) as a surrogate measure of infection.

However, a case for skin disinfection prior to vaccine administration can be made. Sherman et al.Citation14 reported that 70% isopropyl alcohol swabbing prior to ultrasound guided musculoskeletal injection reduced skin flora contamination by 95%. In their study of 26 patients, 21 were culture positive before swabbing and only 1 remained culture positive after swabbing. Moreover, it has been postulatedCitation12 that a 66% reduction in skin flora with 70% Isopropyl alcohol swabbing would be cost-effective in the prevention of vaccine-related cellulitis occurring at a rate of 1 per 2363 injections. Consequently, it may be difficult to defend a case of skin sepsis if skin disinfection was omitted prior to vaccine administration.Citation15

Uncertainty also exists for the gauge of needle to be used in adult vaccination, 23 or 25 gauge. The skin has horizontal neural plexuses at the dermato-epidural junctionCitation16 and its penetration at the different angles (IM injection at 90°, SC injection at 45°) may account for the greater pain immediately after SC compared with IM injection of anthrax vaccine.Citation17 This can be explained on the basis of the longer tract √2 through the neural plexus with SC injection (45°) compared with IM injection at 90°. Consistent with this mechanism of injection pain, narrower gauge needles have been shownCitation18Citation19 to significantly reduce pain during injection compared with wider gauge needles.

Consequently, a 25-gauge, 25-mm long needle should be favored over a 23-gauge, 25-mm long needle for vaccine administration in adults.

There are limited pediatric data on needle gauge for intramuscular vaccine administration. In a study of infants aged 2, 3, and 4 months, Diggle et alCitation20 reported slightly lower rates of ISRs with 25-gauge, 25-mm needles compared with 23-gauge, 25-mm long needles. However, Pathak et al.Citation20 reported higher pain scores (7.3 points) for 25-gauge, 25-mm long needles compared with 23-gauge, 25-mm long needles in children up to 24 months old. The latter study did not specify the site of injection and independent reviewCitation21 noted that “differences of less than 10 points on the 100 mm VAS may not be clinically significant”.

Strict formulation of vaccine administration practice will prevent inadvertent misadministration of COVID-19 vaccine as reported by Ng.Citation22 An evidence-based protocol for vaccine administration is:

  1. Skin disinfection with 70% isopropyl alcohol swabbing.

  2. Selection of the deltoid injection site as the mid-point of the deltoid muscle (between the acromion and deltoid tuberosity) with the arm abducted by placing the hand on the hip.

  3. Vaccine administration with a 25-gauge, 25-mm long needle at 90° to the skin surface of the deltoid muscle.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

References

  • Cook IF. Best vaccination practice and medically attended injection site events following deltoid intramuscular injection. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11:1184–91. doi:10.1080/21645515.2015.1017694.
  • Atanasoff S, Ryan T, Lightfoot R, Johann-Liange R. Shoulder injury related to vaccine administration. Vaccine. 2010;28:8049–52. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.10.005.
  • National vaccine injury compensation program: revisions to the vaccine injury table. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/07/20/2020-15673/national-vaccine-injury-compensation-program-revisions-to-the-vaccine-injury-table .
  • Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):401–06. doi:10.1016/j.clinepi.2010.07.015.
  • Cook IF. An evidence-based protocol for the prevention of upper arm injury related to vaccine administration. Hum Vaccin. 2011;7(8):845–48. doi:10.4161/hv.7.8.16271.
  • Cook IF, Williamson M, Pond D. Definition of needle length required for intramuscular deltoid injection in elderly adults: an ultrasonographic study. Vaccine. 2006;24(7):937–40. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.08.098.
  • Cook IF. Subcutaneous vaccine administration – an outmoded practice. Hum Vacc Immunother. 2020. doi:10.1080/21645515.2020.1814094.
  • Cook IF, Murtagh J. Optimal technique for intramuscular injection of infants and toddlers: a randomized trial. Med J Aust. 2005;183(2):60–63. doi:10.9654/j.1326-5377.2005.tb06922x.
  • Gol I. The effect of the rapid injection technique without aspiration on pain level in intramuscular vaccination – a single blind randomized-controlled trial. Ann Med Res. 2020;27(1):319–25. doi:10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.10.602.
  • Freedman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Eng J Med. 1987;317:141–45. doi:10.1056/NEJM.198707163.17034.
  • Cook IF. Sepsis, parenteral vaccination and skin disinfection. Hum Vacc Immunother. 2016;12(10):2548–59. doi:10.1080/21645515.2016.1190489.
  • Del Mar CB, Glasziou PP, Spinks AB, Sanders SL. Is isopropyl alcohol swabbing before injection really necessary? Med J Aust. 2001;174(6):306. doi:10.5694/1326-5377.2001.t6143279.
  • Wong H, Moss C, Moss SM, Shah V, Halperin SA, Ito S, Mithal P, Au A, Taddio A. Effect of alcohol skin cleansing on vaccination-associated infections and local skin reactions: a randomized, controlled trial. Hum Vacc Immunother. 2019;15(4):995–1002. doi:10.1080/21645515.2018.1553474.
  • Sherman T, Ferguson J, Davis W, Russo M, Argintar E. Does the use of ultrasound affect contamination of musculo-skeletal injection site? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(1):351–57. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3903-4.
  • Cocoman A, Murray J. To swab or not to swab. WIN. 2007;15:26–27. https://www.inmo.ie/magazinearticle/printarticle/6696 .
  • Ebenezer GI, Hauer P, Gibbons C, McArthur JC, Polydefkis M. Assessment of epidermal nerve fibres: a new diagnostic and predictive tool for peripheral neuropathies. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2007;16:1059–70. doi:10.1097/nen.Obo13e3181e5-8989.
  • Marano N, Plikaytis BD, Martin SW, Rose C, Semenova VA. Effect of reduced schedule and intramuscular administration of anthrax vaccine adsorbed on immunological response and safety at 7 months profile: a randomized trial. Vaccine. 2014;300(13):1532–43. doi:10.1001/jama.300:13.1532.
  • Wilga KJ, Skarsvag TI, Lundbom JS, Tangen LF, Ballo S, Hjelseng T, Finsen V. The importance of needle gauge for pain during injection of lidocaine. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2016;50:115–18. doi:10.3109/2000656x.2015.1111223.
  • Diggle L, Deeks JJ, Pollard AJ. Effect of needle size on immunogenicity and reactogenicity of vaccines in infants: a randomized, controlled trial. BMJ 2006 Sept 16; 333(7568): 571. doi:10.1136/bmj.38906.704549.7C.
  • Pathak P, Kalia R, Bharti B. Effect of needle gauge on perception of pain intensity among infants receiving DPT vaccination. Nursing Midwifery Res J. 2007;3(4):172–78. doi:10.33698/NRF0070.
  • Beirne PV, Hennessy S, Cadogan SL, Shiely F, Fitzgerald T, Macleod F. Needle size for vaccination procedures in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;(8)Art.No: 10726. doi:10.1002/14651858.CDO10720.pub3.
  • Ng JY. Inadvertent subcutaneous injection of COVID-19 vaccine. Postgrad Med J. 2021;97:1. doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-139870.