928
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Recipients’ Assessment of Journalistic Quality

Do online user comments or the actual journalistic quality matter?

Pages 563-582 | Published online: 20 Oct 2017
 

Abstract

Many studies and their findings are available concerning most aspects of online user comments and their effects. But there are few data regarding the question of whether user comments have an impact on an audience’s assessment of journalistic quality, and regarding the question of how user comments and the actual journalistic quality interact. Therefore, two experimental studies were conducted. In both experiments, the quality of a journalistic product and the valence of user comments were manipulated. The results indicate that, overall, high-quality journalistic products were evaluated as (slightly) better than low-quality versions. Furthermore, users evaluated the quality of journalistic products with positive user comments as better than the quality of identical products with negative comments. Considering that, in reality, user comments are predominantly critical, it is worrying that these comments have rather negative effects on the evaluation of journalistic work.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 104.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.