Extended pelvic lymph-node dissection and radiotherapy with curative intent in high-risk lymph-node-positive prostate cancer: a possible curative strategy?

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the outcome with a treatment strategy for high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) using extended pelvic lymph-node dissection (eLND) followed by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in lymph-node-positive (LNpos) and lymph-node-negative (LNneg) cases compared with the strategy with limited pelvic lymph-node dissection (lLND) and only giving EBRT to LNneg cases.

Materials and methods: From 2000 to 2006, 124 men with high-risk PCa underwent lLND and initiated androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) before planned EBRT. LNpos patients were excluded from EBRT following the SPCG-7 study strategy (group I). From 2007 to 2013, 111 patients underwent eLND and started ADT before EBRT, and LNneg and most LNpos patients received EBRT (group II). Using Kaplan–Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression, biochemical recurrence-free, metastasis-free, cancer-specific survival and overall survival were compared during a 10 year follow-up.

Results: PSA progression-free survival rates after 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 years were 78%, 66%, 52%, 45% and 41% in group I, and 88%, 83%, 78%, 69% and 69% in group II (p < 0.001), respectively. Group II had a lower risk of PSA progression [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27,0.69, p = 0.001], metastasis development (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.27,0.97, p = 0.040) and overall mortality (HR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.26,0.92, p = 0.027), but not of PCa-specific death (HR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.19,1.08, p = 0.074).

Conclusion: A treatment strategy for high-risk PCa with eLND combined with EBRT in LNneg and LNpos cases may improve outcome compared to a strategy with lLND and offering EBRT only to LNneg cases but ADT to LNpos cases.

Keywords:

• Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy
• external beam radiotherapy
• lymph-node metastasis
• prostate cancer
• survival

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded by the Uppsala–Örebro Regional Research Council.