143
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Comparison of semen quality between university-based and private assisted reproductive technology laboratories

, , , , , & show all
Pages 65-69 | Received 06 Jul 2017, Accepted 21 Nov 2017, Published online: 01 Dec 2017
 

Abstract

Objective: Obtaining a semen analysis (SA) is an essential step in evaluating infertile men. Despite using standardized procedures for analysis semen quality in the same individual often varies on repeated tests. The objective of this study was to investigate inter-laboratory variation in semen quality between private- and university-based assisted reproductive technology (ART) laboratories.

Materials and Methods: IRB approval was obtained to retrospectively evaluate men with a SA at both the private- and university-based ART laboratories. When more than one SA was available from either laboratory, the first at each laboratory was selected for analysis. Comparison of major semen parameters was performed using descriptive statistics and Bland–Altman plots, with differences tested using Wilcoxon-signed rank test.

Results: Twenty-eight men aged 33 ± 5 (mean ± SD) years were included in the study. Motility was higher at the private laboratories compared to the university-based laboratory (Median difference −12.5%, 95% confidence interval −20.3%; −5.5%). Percent normal morphology was higher at the university-based laboratory compared to private laboratories (5.0%, 3.6%; 6.9%). No significant differences were found in volume, concentration and total motile sperm count although the Bland-Altman plot bias for concentration was clinically significant (15.9 × 106/ml).

Conclusions: In this small series, motility was significantly higher at private laboratories compared to a university-based laboratory but was above WHO reference limits at both places. Normal sperm morphology was significantly lower in semen analyses performed at private laboratories compared to a university-based laboratory and was below WHO reference limits.

Disclosure statement

JMD receives grant funding from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan for his role in the Michigan Value Collaborative and Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative. No conflict of interest, financial, or otherwise, are declared by the remaining authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.