194
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Urinary diversion in the treatment of refractory bladder pain syndrome

, , &
Pages 424-430 | Received 07 May 2019, Accepted 25 Jul 2019, Published online: 13 Aug 2019
 

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigates the effect of urinary division in patients with bladder pain syndrome (BPS) refractory to conservative treatment. This study aimed to identify pre-operative predictive factors regarding the surgical outcome in patients undergoing urinary diversion with or without cystectomy (CX).

Methods and patients: This study included 30 patients with BPS treated with a urinary diversion in the period from 2002–2017 at a single university hospital. The surgical procedure was selected on an individual basis, including both continent and non-continent diversions and primary procedure with or without concomitant CX. Pre- and post-operative data were registered retrospectively through medical chart review.

Results: Eight patients were treated with primary CX and eight had secondary CX within a short time following urinary diversion (1.45 years in median), mainly due to persisting pain. However, more than half the patients were successfully treated with urinary diversion alone throughout the follow-up period (estimated 58% after 12 years). Nine patients were prior to surgery diagnosed with Hunner’s lesions, and these had significantly greater pain relief compared to the remaining 21 patients (p = 0.02). The higher success rate of the bladder-preserving procedure was suggested in patients older than 48 years (p = 0.09) with less pain pre-operatively, estimated by less than three opioids prior to the procedure (p = 0.01).

Conclusions: Surgical treatment with urinary diversion should be taken into consideration for refractory BPS, especially patients diagnosed with Hunner’s lesions. These results support a bladder-preserving strategy unless the patient is young or has severe treatment refractory pain pre-operative.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.