Comparison between mini-laparoscopy, conventional laparoscopy and open approach for ureteropelvic junction obstruction treatment in children

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of the study was to compare 3 mm mini-laparoscopy (mini LP), standard 5 mm laparoscopy (LP) and open surgery for pediatric pyeloplasty in a single center.

Methods

Patients who underwent pyeloplasty from 1997 to 2017 at Hospital Sant Joan de Déu were prospectively collected. Demographic data, clinical, surgical and radiological variables were assessed. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed in order to identify risks for surgical complications, urinary leak and need for redo-surgery.

Results

340 pyeloplasties were performed in this period: 197 open, 30 LP and 113 mini LP. Independent risk factors for surgical complications in a multivariate logistic regression model were: LP (vs mini LP, OR = 3.95; 95% CI: 1.13–13.8), higher differential renal function (each point more increases the risk 6%; 95% CI: 1–11%), older children (every year increases the risk 1.11 times; 95% CI: 1.002–1.225). Open surgery, pelvis diameter or the use of different stents were not risk factors. This model had an 80% PPV and a 92% NPV. LP (OR = 4.65; 95% CI: 1.08–19.96) and longer surgical time (OR = 1.014; 95% CI: 1.003–1.025) were independent risk factors for urinary leak. Higher pelvis diameter (OR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.87–0.99) and the use of external stents were independent protective risk factors for urinary leak (OR = 0.09; 95% CI: 0.01–0.72). We have not found independent risk factors for redo-surgery in a multivariate logistic regression model.

Conclusion

mini LP can be safely and effectively used to perform pyeloplasty in pediatric patients of all ages.

Keywords:

• Laparoscopy
• mini-laparoscopy
• pediatric
• pyeloplasty
• ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Michella McMullan for her linguistic revision.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).