Abstract
This article explores the transition from state-centric environmental governance to neoliberalization through a historical examination of environmental remediation efforts in the Detroit River. I analyze the social and environmental impacts of these governance changes through a focus on three dimensions of neoliberalization: marketization, privatization, and quantification. I find that contemporary public involvement in the Detroit River resulted in both social and environmental contradictions: a narrower band of civil society, through nongovernmental organizations, has assumed a more central role in governance and an emphasis on quantifiable progress has shifted attention away from pressing, but intractable challenges in favor of those most easily classified as remediated.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Andrew Van Alstyne
Andrew Van Alstyne in an Assistant Professor of Sociology in the Department of History, Sociology & Anthropology at Southern Utah University. His research interests include the political economy of the environment, water governance, and labor environmentalism.