277
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Who is to blame? Nostalgia, Partisanship, and the death of coal

Pages 471-483 | Received 16 Feb 2021, Accepted 11 Mar 2022, Published online: 23 Mar 2022
 

ABSTRACT

The U.S. energy sector has undergone significant changes in the last few decades with three converging trends – the implosion of the coal industry, the marked increase in domestically produced oil and gas, and the increasing viability of renewables. The implosion of coal has proven to be a contentious political issue, with conservative discourse placing the blame for the industry’s poor fortunes on the administration of former President Obama and federal environmental regulations. Coal occupies a unique space in the cultural imaginaries of the Rural U.S., with significant nostalgia for the industry despite its deleterious legacy. Our study is informed by the concept of community economic identity and recent research on right-wing populism. Using survey data from western Colorado collected in 2019, we evaluate how partisanship and nostalgia are associated with mischaracterizations of the causes of the coal industry’s decline. Republicans are more likely to state that former President Obama and federal environmental regulations are the primary cause of coal’s decline and less likely to state that alternative fuels are the cause. Nostalgia is also associated with naming President Obama and federal environmental regulations. Our results imply that the causes of coal’s collapse may not be well understood.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1. Notably, Tranter and Foxwell-Norton (Citation2021) find that support for coal is higher among conservatives in Australia, and Bowden (Citation2018) describes well-funded pro-coal campaigns in New South Wales. Presumably, the coal industry in other locations may also be engaging in public relations efforts to secure public support and a favorable regulatory environment.

2. This project has relied on funding from the Rural Sociological Society and internal sources.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Rural Sociological Society.

Notes on contributors

Adam Mayer

Adam Mayer is a research associate at Michigan State University. He studies the social dimensions of energy development.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 205.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.