ABSTRACT
This paper contributes to the debate about the enterprise culture by analysing the work ethic among talented employees who are seen as indispensable by their organisations. It describes the drama surrounding the ‘high talent’ IT-consultant Clark, a real individual used as emblematic here, and his quest for power and influence at work. The analysis adds nuance to the claims of both proponents and critics of the enterprise culture by showing how it leads neither to win-win scenarios nor to culturally duped employees. Instead, the enterprise ethic, with its focus on talent and excellence, has produced a group of elite workers who are driven by a sense of entitlement. This leads them to display maverick and disruptive behaviour that endangers the social cohesion of their organisations. But they are still driven by a deep sense of dedication and thus cannot be considered simply self-serving.
Acknowledgement
I should like to thank Professor Tony Huzzard at Lund University for long discussions about Clark and for his very interesting suggestions about ‘self-appointed leadership’.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Notes
1. This is illustrated in the analysis below, when at a meeting they all agree that Clark is indispensable. Clark's immediate superior, the Consultant Manager, also confirmed this several times in informal conversations with me during the fieldwork.