395
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The production of singular- and plural-dominant nouns in Dutch

, , , &
Pages 867-876 | Received 05 Mar 2014, Accepted 27 Feb 2015, Published online: 24 Mar 2015
 

Abstract

The role of number dominance (singular vs. plural) in word production has revealed contrasting results in Dutch and English. Here, we compared the production of Dutch regular plural forms that are more frequent than their stems (plural-dominant plurals) to plurals that are less frequent than their stems (singular-dominant plurals) in a spoken picture-naming paradigm. Moreover, the role of inflectional entropy during spoken word production was assessed. The results revealed that singular-dominant singulars were produced significantly faster and more accurately than their corresponding plurals, independently of inflectional entropy. However, the production of plural-dominant plurals and singulars was modulated by inflectional entropy, and a plural disadvantage only found if the inflectional variants were not uniformly distributed. Critically, uniformly distributed variants showed a plural advantage in this condition. Our findings suggest that singular-dominant and plural-dominant plurals are processed differently, which we discuss in the context of morphological processing theories in spoken language production.

Acknowledgment

We thank Xavier Alario for helpful comments and suggestions.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1. Relative inflectional entropy and inflectional entropy were highly correlated (r = .974). When inflectional entropy was excluded, but relative inflectional entropy included within linear mixed-effects modelling, we obtained effects that were comparable to those of inflectional entropy. Therefore, we will confine the results to inflectional entropy only.

Additional information

Funding

This project was supported by a postdoctoral grant from the Fyssen Foundation to Elisabeth Beyersmann. Britta Biedermann was funded by an Australian Research Council (ARC), Australian Postdoctoral Fellowship (APD, DP110100799).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 444.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.