1,114
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Facing recovery: Emotional bias in working memory, rumination, relapse, and recurrence of major depression; an experimental paradigm conducted five years after first episode of major depression

, &
Pages 299-310 | Published online: 15 Jan 2019
 

Abstract

Identifying vulnerability factors for relapse of depression is essential in planning preventive interventions. Emotional face processing in major depression (MDD) shows promise as a potential cognitive marker for depression. The current study investigates how working memory (WM) load in face processing relates to rumination and new episodes of MDD in a novel explorative paradigm. It was expected that history of MDD is associated with reduction of the ability to process sad stimuli in high WM load conditions and reduction of the ability to process happy stimuli in low WM conditions. It was further predicted that these relations are associated with rumination and risk for relapse. The experiment was included as a cross sectional part in a follow-up study of a population that previously experienced first episode (FE) depression. The FE (N = 23) and a healthy control group (N = 22) completed a WM face processing task. In the task, three happy or sad faces were presented, processed in either a high or low WM taxing manner, followed by a target stimulus consisting of one of the previous pictures. Response time and accuracy were dependent variables. Rumination and number of relapses or recurrences were measured. The FE group recalled the placement of significantly fewer happy faces in the low WM load condition, and significantly fewer sad faces in the high WM load condition compared to controls. Significantly different scores between groups predicted trait rumination. Poor accuracy in the sad high WM load condition correlated with high degree of rumination. Relapse or recurrence was predicted by rumination. The present study supports an emotional WM deficit in remitted MDD. This suggests that deficits in manipulation of sad faces could represent a trait bias related to rumination and depression.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

The present study was funded by Helse Vest and the University of Bergen.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 398.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.