![Sample our Behavioral Sciences journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110801/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Behavioral-Sciences.jpg"})
Abstract
There appears to be a lack of consensus regarding how best to interpret cognitive test findings when there is a failure on only one Performance Validity Test (PVT). The current study examined the impact of failing one freestanding, forced-choice, memory-based (Fr-FC-MB) PVT across two memory measures in a large sample of veterans (N = 1,353). The impact of failing zero, one, or two Fr-FC-MB PVTs (Test of Memory Malingering Trial 1 or the Medical Symptom Validity Test) on subsequent memory measures was examined (California Verbal Learning Test-II [CVLT-II], Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-R [BVMT-R]). Compared to those failing zero PVTs, those failing one PVT showed significant declines across all memory indices with large average effect sizes (BVMT-R, d = −0.9, CVLT-II, d = −1.0). Those failing one PVT had memory scores more similar to those failing two PVTs. There is a need for greater nuance and flexibility when determining invalid test performance. The current findings, along with a brief review of the literature, find that failing even one Fr-FC-MB PVT dramatically (negatively) impacts memory performance. Results suggest that including individuals failing one Fr-FC-MB PVT into a credible group should be more closely scrutinized.
Acknowledgements
The views and opinions contained in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Veteran Affairs. This work was supported by the Office of Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflicts of interests were reported by the author(s).
Correction Statement
This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.