498
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

A qualitative exploration of barriers and enablers of healthy lifestyle engagement for older Australians with intellectual disabilities

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 182-191 | Received 12 Feb 2018, Accepted 09 Nov 2018, Published online: 01 Apr 2019
 

Abstract

Older Australians with intellectual disabilities experience high rates of lifestyle-related illness, yet generally have poor diets and participate in limited physical activity. Eliciting the perspectives of people with intellectual disabilities and support workers may inform interventions to support healthy lifestyles. A semi-structured focus group question framework was developed to investigate participants’ experiences of barriers and enablers of physical activity and healthy eating. Data from focus groups with paid support workers (n = 6) and people with intellectual disabilities (n = 8) aged 60 + years were analysed within this framework. Similarities and differences between perspectives were explored. Both groups perceived decreased physical activity as an inevitable aspect of ageing. Health problems and environmental constraints were also identified. Embedding physical activity into daily routines, providing choices, and viewing exercise as beneficial, were highlighted as enablers across groups. Support workers, but not people with intellectual disabilities, identified barriers to healthy eating including use of “junk” food to manage behaviour and lack of message consistency between care providers. Financial and human resource barriers were also highlighted by support workers. Both carers and people with intellectual disabilities may benefit from specialised support to adapt healthy lifestyle interventions for people as they age. Behavioural management strategies unrelated to food should be promoted. Organisational and policy-level commitment are needed to ensure that healthy lifestyle programs are adequately resourced to meet the needs of the ageing population with intellectual disabilities.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the New South Wales Department of Family and Community Services for funding this research under grant RG161748. The funding body has not been involved in designing or analysing the stakeholder consultations. We would also like to thank all participants for contributing their valuable time and expertise.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 287.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.