![MathJax Logo](/templates/jsp/_style2/_tandf/pb2/images/math-jax.gif)
Abstract
In this paper, we give generalization of an integral inequality. We find its applications in fractional calculus by involving different kinds of fractional integral operators, for example Riemann–Liouville fractional integral, Caputo fractional derivative, Canavati fractional derivative and Widder derivative, Saigo fractional integral operator, etc.
AMS Subject Classifications:
Public Interest Statement
Fractional calculus is as important as calculus and a lot of work has been published in the favor of fractional calculus. Fractional integral inequalities are useful in establishing the uniqueness of solutions of certain partial differential equations, and also provide upper and lower bounds for solutions of fractional boundary value problems. In this paper, an integral inequality is generalized and its applications in fractional calculus are found.
1. Introduction
In the ocean of inequalities, integral inequalities received great attention by many scientists, for example mathematicians, physicists, and statisticians. Here, we want to pay our attention to an integral inequality by Mitrinović and Pečarić (Citation1991).
Theorem 1.1
Let , be non-negative functions and let g be a real function which has the following representation
(1.1)
(1.1)
where , when
, and h is a non-decreasing function. If p, q are two real numbers such that
, then
(1.2)
(1.2)
where
Fractional integral inequalities are useful in establishing the uniqueness of solutions for certain fractional partial differential equations. They also provide upper and lower bounds for the solutions of fractional boundary value problems. These considerations have led various researchers in the field of integral inequalities to explore certain extensions and generalizations by involving fractional calculus operators (see Agarwal & Pang, Citation1995, Anastassiou, Citation2011, Andrić, Pečarić, & Perić, Citation2011, Widder, Citation1941).
In this paper, we are interested to give a generalization of integral inequality (Equation 2). Further, we give applications to fractional calculus; many researchers are working in this field and participate a lot in the theory of inequalities, for example, books in references Anastassiou (Citation2009), Baleano, Diethelm, Scalas, and Trujillo (Citation2012), Kilbas, Srivastava, and Trujillo, Citation2006, Bainov and Simeonov (Citation1992), Widder (Citation1941), also see for papers references Andrić, Barbir, Farid, and Pečarić (Citation2014a,Citation2014b), Andrić, Barbir, Farid, and Pečarić (Citation2014a), Andrić, Pečarić, and Perić (Citation2013a,Citation2013b), Andrić et al. (Citation2011), Canavati (Citation1987) and Farid and Pečarić (Citation2012a,Citation2012b).
The organization of the paper is as follows: In Section 2, we give a generalization of integral inequality (Equation 1.2) and some remarks. In Section 3, we give applications for fractional integrals and fractional derivatives, and in Section 4, we give applications for Widder derivatives and linear differential operators. In the last Section 5, we give improvements of these results. In the whole paper, we suppose that all integrals exist.
2. Main results
Here, we give a generalization of integral inequality (Equation 1.2) and some remarks.
Theorem 2.1
Let ,
be measure spaces with
-finite measures and
, be non-negative functions. Let g be the function having representation
(2.1)
(2.1)
where is a general non-negative kernel and
be a real-valued function, and
is a non-decreasing function. If p, q are two real numbers such that
, then
(2.2)
(2.2)
where
Proof
Using Equation 2.1, we have
where
Therefore, we have
while from value of we get (Equation 2.2).
Corollary 2.2
If we set , then we get
where
Corollary 2.3
If we put and
and replace
by measures
in Theorem 2, then we get Theorem 1.
Remark 2.4
If we put , and
and replace
by measures
, then we get a result of Volkov (Citation1972).
3. Applications for fractional integrals
Let be a finite interval on real axis
. For
, the left-sided and right-sided Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals of order
are defined by
Here, is the gamma function
.
Theorem 3.1
Let p, q be two real numbers such that . Then, for
, we have
(3.1)
(3.1)
where
Proof
If we apply Theorem 2.1 with and the kernel
then g becomes and we get the inequality (Equation 3.1).
Corollary 3.2
If we set , then we get
where
Theorem 3.3
Let p, q be two real numbers such that . Then, for
, we have
(3.2)
(3.2)
where
Proof
Applying Theorem 2.1 with and the kernel
then g becomes and we get the inequality (Equation 3.6).
Corollary 3.4
If we set , then we get
where
Next, we observe the Caputo fractional derivatives (for details see Kilbas et al., Citation2006, Section 2.4, also Anastassiou, Citation2009, p. 449; Baleano et al., Citation2012, p. 16) for define n as
(3.3)
(3.3)
where is the integral part. For
, the left-sided and right-sided Caputo fractional derivatives of order
are defined by
(3.4)
(3.4)
and(3.5)
(3.5)
Theorem 3.5
Let p, q be two real numbers such that . Then, for
,
, and n defined in Equation 3.3, we have
(3.6)
(3.6)
where
Proof
Applying Theorem 2 with and the kernel
and replacing by
, g becomes
and we get the inequality (Equation 3.6).
Corollary 3.6
If we set , then we get
where
Theorem 3.7
Let p, q be two real numbers such that . Then, for
,
, and n defined in Equation 3.3, we have
(3.7)
(3.7)
where
Proof
Applying Theorem 2 with and the kernel
and replacing by
, g becomes
and we get the inequality (Equation 3.7).
Corollary 3.8
If we set , then we get
where
We continue with extensions that require composition identities for the left-sided Caputo fractional derivatives, given in Andrić et al. (Citation2013b).
Lemma 3.9
Let , m and n are given by Equation 3.3 for
and
, respectively. Let
be such that
for
. Let
. Then,
Theorem 3.10
Let p, q be two real numbers such that . Let
, m and n are given by Equation 3.3 for
and
, respectively. Let
be such that
for
. Let
. Then, we have
(3.8)
(3.8)
where
Proof
Applying Theorem 2.1 with and the kernel
and replacing by
, g becomes
and we get the inequality (Equation 3.8).
Corollary 3.11
If we set , then we get
where
Remark 3.12
Using Theorem 2.1 and composition identities for the right-sided Caputo fractional derivatives given in Andrić et al. (Citation2013b, Theorem 2.2), similar results can be stated and proved for the right-sided Caputo fractional derivatives (for details see Andrić et al., Citation2014a; Farid, & Pečarić, Citation2012b).
Results given for the Caputo fractional derivatives can be analogously done for two other types of fractional derivative that we observe: Canavati type and Riemann–Liouville type. Here, as an example inequality for each type of fractional derivatives, we give inequality analogous to the Equation 3.8 obtained with composition identity for the left-sided fractional derivatives. Proofs are omitted.
For more details on the Canavati fractional derivatives, see Canavati (Citation1987): we consider subspace defined by
For , the left-sided Canavati fractional derivative of order
is defined by
Composition identity for the left-sided Canavati fractional derivatives is given in Andrić et al. (Citation2011):
Lemma 3.13
Let ,
, and
. Let
be such that
for
. Then,
and
Theorem 3.14
Let p, q be two real numbers such that . Let
, m and n given by Equation 3.3 for
and
, respectively. Let
be such that
for
. Then, we have
where
For more details on Riemann–Liouville fractional derivatives, see Kilbas et al. Citation2006, Section 2.1: for , the left-sided Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative of order
is defined by
The following lemma summarizes conditions in the composition identity for the left-sided Riemann–Liouville fractional derivatives (for details see Andrić et al., Citation2013a).
Lemma 3.15
Let ,
, and
. The composition identity
is valid if one of the following conditions holds:
(i) |
| ||||
(ii) |
| ||||
(iii) |
| ||||
(iv) |
| ||||
(v) |
| ||||
(vi) |
| ||||
(vii) |
|
Theorem 3.16
Let p, q be two real numbers such that . Also, let
,
, and
. Suppose that one of the conditions in (i)-(vii) in Lemma 3.15 holds for
and let
, then we have
where
Next, we give the results for a generalized fractional integral operator, the Saigo fractional integral operator (for details see, Saigo, Citation1978).
Let . Then, the Saigo fractional integrals
of order
for a real-valued continuous function
are defined by:
(3.9)
(3.9)
where, the function appearing as the kernal for operator (Equation 3.9) is the Gaussian hypergeometric function defined by
and is the Pochhammer symbol:
.
Theorem 3.17
Let p, q be two real numbers such that . Then, for
, we have
(3.10)
(3.10)
where
Proof
Applying Theorem 2 with and the kernel
g becomes
and we get the inequality (Equation 3.10).
Corollary 3.18
If we set , then we get
where
Remark 3.19
If we put in Theorem 3.17, then we get the results for the right sided Riemann–Liouville fractional integral.
4. Applications for Widder derivatives and linear differential operators
In this section, we apply our results for Widder derivatives and linear differential operators. The following are taken from Widder (Citation1928).
Let , and the Wronskians
(4.1)
(4.1)
. Here,
. Assume
over
.
For , the differential operator of order
(Widder derivative):
(4.2)
(4.2)
. Consider also
(4.3)
(4.3)
.
Example 4.1
Sets of the form are
,
, etc.
We also mention the generalized Widder–Talylor’s formula (see Anastassiou, Citation2011; Widder, Citation1928).
Theorem 4.2
Let the functions , and the Wronskians
on
. Then, for
, we have
(4.4)
(4.4)
where
For example (Widder, Citation1928), one could take . If
, defined on
,, then
and
. We need the following result.
Corollary 4.3
By additionally assuming for fixed that
, we get that
(4.5)
(4.5)
Note that all the results of this section are under the assumptions of Theorem 4.2 and Corollary 4.3.
Theorem 4.4
Let p, q be two real numbers such that . Then, we have
(4.6)
(4.6)
where
Proof
Applying Theorem 2 with and the kernel
with particular kernel
, also replacing
by
becomes
and we get the inequality (Equation 4.6).
Corollary 4.5
If we set , then we get
where
Onward, we follow Kreider, Kuller, and Perkins (Citation1966, pp. 145–154).
Let be a closed interval of
. Let
be continuous functions on
and let
be a fixed linear differential operator on
. Let
be a set of linear independent solutions to
. Here, the associated Green’s function for
is
(4.7)
(4.7)
which is a continuous function on . Consider fixed
, then
(4.8)
(4.8)
is the unique solution to the initial value problem(4.9)
(4.9)
Theorem 4.6
Let p, q be two real numbers such that . Then, we have
(4.10)
(4.10)
where
Proof
Applying Theorem 2 with and the kernel
with particular kernel
, also replacing
by
becomes
and we get the inequality (Equation 4.10).
Corollary 4.7
If we set , then we get
where
5. Generalization of previous results
In this last section, we want to give improvements of the previous results.
Theorem 5.1
Let and
be measure spaces with
-finite measures and
, be non-negative functions. Let g be the function that has the following representation
(5.1)
(5.1)
where is a general non-negative kernel and
be a real-valued function. If
are positive real numbers such that
, then
(5.2)
(5.2)
where
Proof
For fixed we define
as follows
For these numbers, one can observe
and from this we obtain(5.3)
(5.3)
Using the representation of g, and Equation 5.3, we have
Now, using the inequality between arithmetic and geometric means, we have
Thus, we have
Using definition of , we get (Equation 5.2).
Corollary 5.2
If we set , then we have
where
Corollary 5.3
If we put and
, and replace
by measures
, respectively, in Theorem 5.1, then we get Varośenec (Citation1995, Theorem 1). Further, if we set
, we get a generalization of Volkov’s result (Citation1972).
Remark 5.4
If we take in Equation 5.2 of Theorem 5.1, we get Equation 2.2 of Theorem 2.1.
Remark 5.5
Applications of results in this section for various types of fractional integrals and fractional derivatives can be observed in Sections 3 and 4 and we omit the details.
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Ghulam Farid
I am working as Assistant Professor in the department of Mathematics COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Attock Campus, Pakistan. I have completed my PhD in the subject of Mathematics from Abdus Salam School of Mathematical Sciences, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan with specialization in Mathematical inequalities. My research interest area is Mathematical analysis, Functional analysis, Fractional Calculus, Mathematical Statistics. Recent paper is on generalization of an integral inequality and its applications in fractional calculus. Fractional integral inequalities are useful in establishing the uniqueness of solutions of certain partial differential equations also provides upper and lower bounds for the solutions of fractional boundary value problems.
References
- Agarwal, R. P., & Pang, P. Y. H. (1995). Opial inequalities with applications in differential and difference equations. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
- Anastassiou, G. A. (2009). Fractional differentiation inequalities. New York, NY: Springer.
- Anastassiou, G. A. (2011). Advanced inequalities (Vol. 11). Singapore: World Scientific.
- Andrić, M., Pe\v{c}arić, J., & Peri\’{c}, I. (2011). Improvements of composition rule for the Canavati fractional derivatives and applications to Opial-type inequalities. Dynamic Systems and Applications, 20, 383–394.
- Andri\’{c}, M., Pe\v{c}ari\’{c}, J., & Peri\’{c}, I. (2013a). A multiple Opial type inequality for the Riemann--Liouville fractional derivatives. Journal of Mathematical Inequalities, 7, 139–150.
- Andri\’{c}, M., Pe\v{c}ari\’{c}, J., & Peri\’{c}, I. (2013b). Composition identities for the Caputo fractional derivatives and applications to Opial-type inequalities. Mathematical Inequalities & Applications, 16, 657–670.
- Andri\’{c}, M., Barbir, A., Farid, G., & Pe\v{c}ari\’{c}, J. (2014a). Opial-type inequality due to Agarwal--Pang and fractional differential inequalities. Integral Transforms and Special Functions, 25, 324–335.
- Andri\’{c}, M., Barbir, A., Farid, G., & Pe\v{c}ari\’{c}, J. (2014b). More on certain Opial-type inequality for fractional derivatives and exponentially convex functions. Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Applications, 19, 563–584.
- Bainov, D., & Simeonov, P. (1992). Integral inequalities and applications. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
- Baleano, D., Diethelm, K., Scalas, E., & Trujillo, J. J. (2012). Fractional calculus: Models and numerical methods. Singapore: World Scientific.
- Canavati, J. A. (1987). The Riemann--Liouville integral. Nieuw Archief Voor Wiskunde, 5, 53–-75.
- Farid, G., & Pečarić, J. (2012a). Opial type integral inequalities for fractional derivatives. Fractional Differential Calculus, 2, 31–54.
- Farid, G., & Pe\v{c}ari\’{c}, J. (2012b). Opial type integral inequalities for fractional derivatives II. Fractional Differential Calculus, 2, 139–155.
- Kilbas, A. A., Srivastava, H. M., & Trujillo, J.J. (2006). Theory and applications of fractional differential equations ( North-Holland mathematics studies, Vol. 204). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
- Kreider, D., Kuller, R., & Perkins, F. (1966). An introduction to linear analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Mitrinovi\’{c}, D. S., & Pe\v{c}ari\’{c}, J. (1991). Two integral inequalities. SEA Bulletin of Mathematics, 15, 153–155.
- Saigo, M. (1978). A remark on integral operators involving the Gauss hypergeometric functions. Mathematical reports, Kyushu University, 11, 135–143.
- Varo\’{s}enec, S. (1995). A remark on Volkov’s result. Rad HAZU, Matematicke znanosti, 470, 199–203.
- Volkov, V. N. (1972). Utočnenie neravenstva Geldera. Uč. Zap. Mosk. Gos. Ped. Inst. im. B. I. Lenena-Neravenstva-Moskva, 460, 110–115.
- Widder, D. V. (1928). A generalization of Taylor’s series. Transactions of AMS, 30, 126–154.
- Widder, D. V. (1941). The Laplace transform. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.